The High Court dismissed the petitioner's writ petition as withdrawn with liberty to avail appropriate remedies against the closure of a crime number mentioned in the case.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT FORTHE STATEOF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (SPecial Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY, THE TENTHDAYOF DECETUBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE P. NAVEENRAO
WRIT PETI TtoN NO. 14207 0F 2020
Between:
Naresh Kumar Yalla, S/o. Keshav Rao Yalla, Age32 years, Occ: Software Engineer, R/o.103, Plot No.90/A, Venkataramana Colony, GokulPlots, KPHB, Ranga Reddy District'
...PETITT.NER
AND
..,RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit.filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondents No.s to 7 and 9 in interfering with personal life and liberty of the petitioner and his family members and thereby harassing in an uncon stitutiona I way to mental and physical harassment and in arresting and detention of the petitioner and not registering FIR upon the complaint made by the petitioner, in the early hours at 12.30 A.M. dated 14-3-2019 and in cooperating with the respondent No.9 as illegal, highhanded, abuse of powers and contrary to theguidelines issued by the Supreme Court of lndia and consequently direct the respondents No.1 to 4 to take appropriate disciplinary action against respondent No.S to 7 and the concerned Poljce officials, who subjecting the petitioner and his family members to mental and physical harassment and continuing to cause irreparable loss and direct the No.8 to take appropriate disciplinary action against the respondent No.9 for abuse of powers and in not following Central Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules,'1965 and to register the case under DP-3 against the respondent No.9 and further direct the respondents No.1 and 2 to direct the re-investigation of crime No.9'18/2019 according to law in the interest ofjustice.
lA NO: 1 oF 2020
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to initiate action against the accused by investigating into Cr.No.918/2019 properly pending disposal of the above writ petition.
1A NO: 2 OF 2020
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to receive the copy of Protest Petition in Crl.M.P.No.92 of 2020 in Cr.No.91B of 2019 on the file of the Vlll Addl. Metropolitan Magistrate, Cyberabad, Kukatpally as additional material papers in W.P.No. 14207 of 2020 as part andparcel of materialpapers in the interest ofjustice.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI VEMPATI MALLIKARJUN SHASTRY
Counsel forthe Respondent Nos. 1 to 5: GP FOR HOME
Counsel for the Respondent Nos.6 to 9: NONE APPEARED
The Court made the following: ORDER
HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P. NAVEEN RAO
WRIT PETITION No. 14207 of 2O2O
ORAL ORDER:
When the matter is taken up, learned counsel for petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to avail appropriate remedies against closure of Crime No. 918 of 2Ol9 of Miyapur police station. Granting liberty as sought for, writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. Miscellaneor-rs petitions, if any pending, are
closed
SD/.M.MANJ ASSISTANT REGI
,TRUE COPY// SE OFFICER
To, e CC to SriVemPati Mall ika rju n Shastry, Ad vocate IOPUCI 2. Two CCs to GP forHome, High Court for the State oi Telan-ganaat HYderabad. tourl 3. Two CDCoPies. MP !p-
(
HIGH COURT
DATED:1011212020
ORDER
WP.No.14207 of 2020
1 H E s T4
o
(.) 22DEC?{ft,]
( I
,^
//
*
-t
)7
DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS
@ P \q,
Naresh Kumar Yalla
The State of Telangana
Mr. Raghuram
Dr. Perni Gowri Shankar Rao
P. Naveen Rao
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
