The High Court dismissed a civil revision petition challenging an interlocutory order as infructuous because the underlying suit was already disposed of years prior by the trial court, leaving no subject matter for adjudication.
Dismissal of the civil revision petition as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE O[ TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
FRIDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF MARCH
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE SHAMEEM AKTHER
CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 5099 OF 2013
Petition under Article 227 ol lhe Constitution of India, aggrieved by the Order dated.14-8-2013 passed in l.A No. 2640 of 2012in O.S No. 583 of 2009 on the file of the Court of the ll Additional Chief Judge, City Civil Court, at Hyderabad
Between:
...Petitioner/Respondents Defendant
AND
M/s. Virgo Construction, represented by its Managing Partner, Sri B.N. Reddy, R/o. 3-6-67 & 68, B.N. Reddy Towers, Basheerbagh, Hyderabad-29.
...RespondenUPetitioner/Plaintiff
l.A. NO: 1 OF 2013(CRPMP. NO: 7074 OF 2013)
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to stay of all fudher proceedings in O.S No. 583 of 2009 on the file of ll Additional Chief Jduge City Civil Court, at Hyderabad pending disposal of the CRP
Counsel for the Petitioners: SRI NAZIR AHMED KHAN
Counsel for the Respondent: NONE APPEARED
The Court made the following: ORDER
THE HON'BLE Dr, JUSTICE SHAMEEM AKTI'IER
C.R.P.No.5099 of 2O13
ORDER:
No representation for both sides.
The case status placed by the Registry before th s Court reveals that the subject suit in O,S.No.583 of 2009 or tl-re file of the II Additional Chief Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad, was disposed of on 04.10.2018. Under these circumstances, nothing survives for adjudication in this Civil Revision Petitic n, which is filed challenging an interlocutory order passed in the:raid suit.
Accordingly, this Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as
infructuous. No costs.
Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in thi!; CIlP, shall
stand closed.
//TRUECOPY//
sc /-l.llAGALAKSHMI ASSI:;TANTREGISTRAR ,=,i#orr,".*
To,
'1 . The ll Additional ChiefJudge' City Civil Court' at Hyderabad
2, OnECC tO SRI NAZIRAHIVIEDKHAN, AdVOCAIE[OPUC]
HIGH COURT
DRSAJ
DATED: 0610312020
ORDER
CRP.No.5099 of 2013
$E STA fa c.
{
,t
o
ti 29l'lAt2m
E l-
DISMISSING THE CIVIL. REVISION PETITION AS INFRUCTUOUI; WII'HOUT COSTS
w,'s\ \.,4 j 2D
Smt Ashrufunnissa Begum
Omer Bin Hussain Ba'fana
M/s. Virgo Construction
DR. JUSTICE SHAMEEM AKTHER
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
