The court dismissed a Civil Revision Petition under Article 226 as infructuous because the underlying civil suit was already disposed of by the lower court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
\
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
FRIDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF MARCH
TWO THOUSAND AT\b TWENTY
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE DR, JUSTICE SHAMEEM AKTHER
CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 4822 OF 2013
Petition under Arlicle 227 oI the Constitution of lndia, aggrieved by the Order dated. 8/11/2013 passed in l.A.No.'l 3212013 in O.S.No.1B of 2012 on the file of the Court of the Junior Civil Judge, Chennur, Adilabad District
Between:
Godishela Gopal Reddy, S/o Chinna Ashi Reddy, Occ: Agriculture, R/o Sirsa Village, Kotapally [Vlandal, Adilabad District.
... Petitioner/Petitione r
AND
... Res pondents/Responde nts
l.A. NO: 1 OF 2013(CRPMP. NO: 6612 OF 2013)
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to grant interim order directing the Station House Officer, P.S.Kotapally to provide protection to the petitioner to harvest the standing crop which would otheruvise result in irreparable loss and damage pending disposal of the Revision Petition
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI POCHAIAH DORISHETTI
Counsel for the Respondent No.2 and 3: SRI P. LAKSHMA REDDY
Gounsel for the Respondent Nos. 1,4 to 8: NONE APPEARED
The Court made the following: ORDER
THE HON,BLE DT. ]USTICE SHAMEEM AKIHER.
C.R.P.No.4822 of 2OL3
@.EB:
Heard. Perused the record.
The learned counsel for the petitioner would sui:mit that the subject suit in O.S.No.1B of 2012 on the file of t1e Junior Civil Judge, Chennur, was disposed of on 09.09.2019,. Under these circumstances, nothing survives for adjudic:tion in this Civil Revision Petition, which is filed challenging an interlocutory order passed in the said suit.
Accordingly, this Civil Revision Petition is(lismissed as infructuous. No costs.
Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this CRP, shall
stand closed.
//TRUE COPY//
SI/- I.NAGA LAKSHMI ASSISTI\NT RE-GISTRAR ----1'')--t
SE:CTION OFFICER
To,
HIGH COURT
DRSAJ
DATED: OGlO3l2020
ORDER
CRP.No.4822 of 2013
.,{g SiA iA
+ /
l
2 I l'1AI 2m o
rl4<
o
F)
DISMISSING THE CIVIL REVISION PETITION AS INFRUCTUOI,'S WITHOUT COSTS
)9
Godishela Gopal Reddy
Kushnapally Rajamallu
Kushnapally Ankaiah
Kushnapally Mallaiah
Kushanapally Ramesh
Pilli Maraiah
Shameem Akther
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
