In a civil revision petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging an interlocutory order in a suit that had already been disposed of, the High Court of Telangana held that nothing survives for adjudication and dismissed the petition as infructuous without costs.
CRP dismissed as infructuous without costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THURSDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF IVARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE SHAMEEM AKTHER
CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 4329 OF 2013
Petition under Arlicle 227 of Constitution of lndia, aggrieved by the Order dated 2210712013 in lA No.22112013 in OS No.63 of 2012 on the file of the Court of the Principal Junior Civil Judge, Kothagudem.
Between:
JAMTVULA SATYA PRAKASH, S/o. Late Hanumaiah,
...PETITIONERY RESPONDENT/ DEFENDANT
AND
PlNGlLl HYMAVATHI @ JAMIVULA HYIVAVATHI, W/o. Giri Kumar,
...RESPONDENT/ PETITIONERY PLAINTIFF
CRPMP. NO: 5895 OF 2013
Petition under Section 151 of CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to stay of all further proceedings in OS.No.63/2012 on the file of learned Principal Junior Civil Judge, Kothagudem, Khammam District pending disposal of the above CRP.
For the Petitioner : SRI S.MADAN MOHAN RAO, Advocate
For the Respondent : SRI R.R.KALYAN, Advocate
The Court made the following: ORDER
THE HO,N,BLE DT. JUSTICE SHAMEEM AKIHER,
Civi Revision Petiti on No.4329 of 2013
ORDER
No repres e ltation for both sides.
The case status placed by the Registry before tlris Court reveals that thr,: subject suit in O.S.No.63 of 2012 crn the file of the Principal lunior Civil Judge, Kothagudem, was di:;po:;ed of on 19.08.2019. llnder these circumstances, nothing survives for adjudicatlon in this Civil Revision Petition, wh ch is filed challenging an nterlocutory orderpassed in the said suit.
According ly, this Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as
infructuous. N(: costs.
Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this CRP, shall
stand closed.
Sdi.CH VEI]KATESWARLU ASSII]TANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY'
SECTION OFFICER
To
HIGH COURT
DATED:05/03/2020
c OF T
?.<br>'t^
..\ Yr)
rc, -1 i- t' ,il
? ijl >j ll
i'il
)o $"
a .c//
-1,".7
uili .,0- :.y'
ORDER
CRP.No.4329 ol 2013
DISMISSING THE CRP /\S INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS.
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a civil revision petition challenging an interlocutory order survives for adjudication after the principal suit has been disposed of.
JAMTVULA SATYA PRAKASH
PINGILl HYMAVATHI
SHAMEEM AKTER
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
