The Civil Revision Petition challenging an interlocutory order in a suit already disposed of by the lower court is dismissed as infructuous. No legal principle is laid down; the order is a procedural disposition due to the subject suit's termination.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THURSDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE SHAMEEM AKTHER
CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO:4331 OF 2013
Petition under Arlicle 227 of Constitution of lndia, aggrieved by the Order dated 2910712013 in lA No.222 of 2013 in OS No.63 of 2012 on the file of the Court of the Principal Junior Civil Judge, Kothagudem, Khammam Drstrict.
Between:
JAIVMULA SATYA PRAKASH, S/o late Hanumaiah,
...PETITIONERY RESPONDENT / DEFENDANT
AND
PlNGlLl HYMAVATHI @ JAIMX/ULA HYIVAVATHI, W/o Giri Kumar,
...RESPONDENT/ PETITIONER/ PLAINTIFF
CRPMP. NO: 5898 OF 2013
Petition under Section 151 of CPCpraying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may bepleased to stay of all further proceedings in OS.No.63 of 2012 on the file of learned Principal Junior Civil Judge, Kothagudem, Khammam District.
For the Petitioner : SRI S.MADAN MOHAN RAO, Advocate(not present)
For the Respondent : SRI R.R.KALYAN, Advocate(not present)
The Court made the following: ORDER
THE HOIVBLE DT. JUSTICE SHAMEEM AKTHER
Civil tl.evision Petition No.4331 of 2O13
ORDER
No represertation for both sides.
The case sitatus placed by the Registry before this Court reveals that the r;ubject suit in O.S.No.63 of 2OL2 on the file of the Principal Jurirrr Civil Judge, Kothagudem, was disJrosr:d of on 19.08.2019. [].rder these circumstances, nothing :urvives for adjudication in this Civil Revision Petition, whir:h is filed challenging an lrrterlocutory order passed in the said:;uit
According v. this Civil Revision Petition is d sm ssed as infructuous. Nc ccsts.
Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in thii CR.P, shall
stand closed.
IJd/-M.IVANJ LA ASSIIJTANT REGI R //TRUE COPY//
SE()'TION OFFICER
To
HIGH COURT
DATED:05/03/2020
.,44=Er
7.1 i HE s i.o ";--
Cr
t
(
t.
n a_l
Cri
\ fl
<br>,<li,::,
ORDER
CRP.No.4331 of 2013
DISMISSING THE CRI),\S INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS.
*$ iI\rpr-o \6='
JAIVMULA SATYA PRAKASH
PINGLII HYMAVATHI
DR. JUSTICE SHAMEEM AKTHER
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
