The High Court allowed the petitioners Nos. 2 and 3 to be exempted from personal appearance in the trial court while the proceedings remain pending, noting their advanced age and livelihood in Bangalore.
Exemption from personal appearance granted to petitioners Nos. 2 and 3; proceedings in CC No. 1876 of 2020 to continue.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
[/ONDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF DECEIVBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.VINOD KUMAR
CRIM| NAL PETITION NO: 6144 OF 2020
Between:
...PETITIONER/ACCUSED NO.2 to 4
AND
...RESPONDENTS/COMPLAINANT
Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may bepleased to quash the proceedings in CC No- 1876/2020 on the file of the Learned Addl Judicial First class Magistrate, Kodad, and bepleased topass such other order or orders as deemed fit and proper in the interest ofjustice.
l.A. NO: 1 OF 2020
Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.Cpraying that in the circumstances stated in the lt/emorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may bepleased to stay all further proceedings including appearance of the Petitioners in CCNo; 187612020 on the file of the Learned Addl Judicial First class Magistrate,Kodad, pending disposal of the above quash petition in the interest ofjustice.
This Petition coming on for hearing, uponperusing theMemorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri G.Ravi Chandran, Advocate for the Petitioner and the AdditionalPublic Prosecutoron behalf of the Respondent No 1.
The Court made the following: ORDER
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE T, VINOD KUMAR
Criminal Petition No.6144 of 2O2O
ORDER:
The present Criminal Petition is filed under Section 482 of (l:'.1).C. st:cl<ing to rluasl.r thc: C.C.No. 1876 oi 2O2O on thc I'i1c of Additional Judicial lrirst Class Magistrate's Courrt, Kodad, rvhich has bccn registered, based on the complaint made by thr: 2"4 rt'sponclcnt/de /rrclo cornplitin:rnt, upon s hir:h ar c.r.se, uid': Crimc No.2(r ol 2O20 lras bcr:n bookr:cl bv tlrc Anantirqin Polrcc Str.rtion, Suryapet District.
)
grantccl cxcmptiorr iror.rr :iltpc:.irancc ltr:litrc tho lrail corrrl irr C(l No. 1876 ol 2020.'l'hc lcarned counscl lvould lurthcl suL;nrit th;rt thc de facto complarnant has lodged thc present complaint alicr t\'o vcarrs ol thc alleged ir-rcidcnt t:rking placc, u,hich also necd ro be looked into to see the genuincness of the cornplaint lodgcd.
3
SD/. K.SAILESHI ASSISTANT REGIST
,TRUE COPY//
SECTION OFFICER
To,
CDLq*--
HIGH COURT
DATED:0711212020
tlu S T4 IE
y
oo 11DEC2m
ORDER
CRLP.No.6144 of 2020
DISPOSING OF THE CRIMINAL PETITION
SsV, o
Y rEPr €j
l- I
)Fr\+,b
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the petitioners Nos. 2 and 3, who are sister and brother-in-law of Accused No. 1, be exempted from personal appearance in the trial court pending disposal of the quash petition.
Whether the inherent powers of the High Court to quash criminal proceedings under Section 482 Cr.P.C. should be exercised in the facts of the case.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Naras Tigala Lakshmi
Dugyala Andalu
Duglaya Vengal Rao
State of Telangana
Naras Thigala Usha
T. Vinod Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
