Criminal Petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C seeking quashing of proceedings, stay of proceedings/arrest, and dispensation of certified copy for offences under IPC. Court disposed of the petitions.
Disposal of Criminal Petition No. 6406 of 2020.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
WEDNESDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF DECEMBER
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.VINOD KUMAR
CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 6406 OF 2020
Betwee n:
AND
...Respondents/Complainant
Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P .C praying that in the circumstances stated in the lvlemorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to quash the criminal proceedings in Crime No. 559 of 2020 of Police Station Jagtial Town, Jagtial, for the offences Punishable U/Sec.1BB, 270,273,353 r/w 34 lPC.
LA. NO: 2OF 2020
Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the lVemorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings including arrest of the Petitio ners/Accused Nos.1 to 3 herein in Crime No. 559 of 2020 of Police Station Jagtial Town, Jagtial, for the offences Punishable U/Sec.'188, 270,273,353 riw 34 IPC.
l.A. NO: 1OF 2020
Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the [,4emorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to dispense with filing of Certified copy of the Crime No. 559 of 2020 of Police Station Jagtial Town, Jagtial, for the offences Punishable U/Sec.188, 270,273,353 r/w 34 IPC and accept the Xerox copy of the same.
This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the lVemorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri Hussain Aamir, Advocate for the Petitioners and the Additional Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent No.1 and of the Respondent No.2 not appearing in person or by Advocate.
The Court made the following: ORDER
aql 6u AAolloJ rol sorlroqine / .1,:uo[it: 6ut1o6 1t;;-.,r'.tt ;rql o] uorl)orp e 6urlaos lo luelxopalturl atll o.llaAP-td srLl 5t; itulsl-t !t iJ'.-r.r-) o^oqe oLll u! s6urpaalo.rd aql 6urqsenb roJpolrl sr uorirlad leurLr.rr-r: luosard aql qbnoql lelll lrurqnsplnoM srouorlrlad aql rol lasunofpoureal S 'slclred eLll lno SurMcrLit pup 5ur0fJp.rp,\q srrlf p
lenUJosrr.{ 6urr.urol-laduJo4 ZoN luapuodso-r -lueureldLuorolle; Jp ;)(.ll palrn.rlsqo a^PLl sa:Iel)ossP srr..l pue t pu? t'z soN pasnlre'sla>i:ed exn6 pauueq aql 6urzras ur sorlnp srLl aOJeqlsrp ol 6ur,(rl spM Z'oN luapuodsor -lueurelduo:olreJ ap aLll ua[]M 1eq1st lurelduo: aq1 ur uorle6allpraql.rir1 aq1'slalled e11n6 aq1pazraspue I'oNpasnlle /1 o11 Lauorlrlad Jo asnoLi oLllpals;r^ queurelduor olrel ap / Z'oN luapuodser uaLlM 's1a1:ed e11n6 pauueq lo uorssassod ur punoJ araM srauor}lad aql 'leull sr srauorllad aql lsure6e paralsr6ar UIj aql ur uor1e5olle/ile lra^o oLl-L V
'lesodsrp pue 6uueaq rol dn ua1e1 sr asel aloqe aL.ll'sarlrpd oql qloq Jo luasuol aql qllM olels aql ro1 6ur.reodde -rolnlcsord lrlqncl leuorlrppVpaurealpue srauorlrlad aql ..ioJ losurrolpaLrrpal preJH t '6ur:uc.raluo: ocprr, q 6norq1 '0ZOZ'ZI'Z0 a r 'Aepol buueaqro1 dn ua1e1 sr uorlrlad leururir oql Z ldl
ttuorlrasq}Mpear tstpue uz'1LZ'BBIsuoll)os ]apune;qeqsrund saluaJ]o aLll .roJ srauolltlad aq1 lsure6eparalsl6ar '1et16e5'uottpls alrlod u,r,ro-1 1er16e6 lo alu aql uo 0zoz Jo 6ss oN auJl.ll ul s6utpae:old lPulu.l-ll qsenb o1 6urlaes '(,'l a'rf aLll,/l.roqs roJ) t16I 'arnpa:or6 leurLuul Jo apof aq:t Jo zB, uo!]]as Japunpolu sr uotllJad leutulul luasold aql
E.Iddo-
OZOZ lo 9019'oN NOIIII-Id lVNIi.^lIUf uvr^Jnx ooNIA'l l)Ilsnt IUs ;rlg,NoH .rHl
; I I
vt\li\ sardoS oc oM1 It [CnaO]a]eco^pV'lluiev ulessnH uS ol CO auo [f nO] PeqeraP,{P11e 'eue6uelel L jo alets oq] Joj unoOq6tg 'rolnceso.td cllqnd leuolllppvaql ol sOC oMf z '1cu1sr6'1er16ep 'uotlels ocllod uMoI 1et10ep':actg6 asnoH uollels ot1l '1er16ep 1e'e1el1st6ey1 sselC lsJll lerclpnf leuolllppv ]slll eLlI I oI
uf9HJO NOlrCfs
,ldo3 3nul//
U SICSU INVISISSV VNHSIUY VNVI^IVU'l^J1PS t,/z ccs I Gtoz) 'rapJo leuu srr.ll
1o 1qOrlaq1 ur pasolrpuels lleLls'Aue Jr'suollrlad snoauellarsru6urpuaql B '1o pasodsrp sr uorlrlad leuru.r.o oql/uorlrarp a^oqe alll ol lre[qns '(erdns) asel Sreuny qsaurv ur pnol xady aql Aq lno las se f dr) V-It uortras.rapun paqulsard arnparord aq1 Mo loJ o:l pallarp sr A:uabe 6u 1a6rlsanur/sarl JoLllne alrlod luapuodso.r irql ',r,ro1oq ro sreaA oral 1o luauuosudr-u sr aLurJl luasard or..ll ur srauorlrlad i)qi lsuieOPpoOJl e solLro]lo aql .rol poqu:sa.rd luoLrqsrund urnurxeu aql 'o)uLs pue 'a^oqe se apeLu suorssruJqns aq1 o1 prebar 6urne; l_ '(erdns) ase) qreunx qsaurv ur l-rnol xady alq,uop1 aq1 ,rq poqlr:scrd saurlaprn6 aLll MOllol plnoM sarluoqlne arlod luopuodsar Oql leLll lrLUqns pin0M .rOlnlasord lrlqnd lPUO|Ippv paureal 9
'ivHrs lo ilvJS tno 's/A avMnx HSgNaV Jo asel aLll ur unol xadv alq,uoH aLll ^q 1assourlaprnb aql pue f d rf V-Ibuorllas rapun paqucsard arnparord
a
HIGH COURT
TVKJ
DATED:0211212O20
ORDER
1 Ht s I,q
e
oo 10 DEC20m
* *
P41
CRLP.No.6406 ot 2020
DISPOSING OF THE CRIMINAL PETITION
3 issues framed by the court
Whether criminal proceedings for offences punishable under Sections 1BB, 270, 273, 353 read with Section 34 of IPC should be quashed.
Whether further proceedings including arrest of petitioners should be stayed in Crime No. 559 of 2020.
Whether certified copy of crime report should be dispensed with in favour of Xerox copy.
3 provisions across 2 enactments
Md Raheemoddin
lVld Sabil @ l\,4ohammed Hakeem
l\,4d Karim
The State of Telangana
G Srinivas
T. VINOD KUMAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
