Writ petition challenging false criminal cases and detainment of the petitioner's father and family members was dismissed as withdrawn by the petitioner with liberty to file fresh petitions separately.
None granted; petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT FOR THE SI r.o""';i |lE,3j l::3jj:,fl,fAr HYDERABAD
WEDNESDAY, THE, S^ECOND DAY OF DECEMBER TWo rHousAND AND rwir.riv-",'
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE T. VINOD KUMAR
Between:
WRIT PETITI ON NO 17773 0 F 2020
Ril15fr 31i,?1t3ilt:::i:,',f,'J#":ffi i"",y j;:K",ru3^?:.;tfl H:',
AND
...PETITIONER
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of lVlandamus declaring the action of the respondent Nos.3 to 5 in registering the false criminal cases against the father of the petitioner and family members by illegally and detaining them in different police stations and also trying to kill the father of the petitioner of the name of encounter and to providing the protection to the life and liberty of the father of the petitioner and his family members by colluding with the respondent Nos.6 to 13 is highly illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional, unjust and in violation of violation of Principles of Natural Justice and also in violation of Articles 14, 19 and 21 of constitution of lndia and consequently to direct the respondent Nos. 3 to 5 to provrde the protection to life and liberty of the petitioner's father and his family members and not to harass the petitioner's father and family members.
il2il
lA NO: 1 OF 2O2O
Petition under Section 151 CPCpraying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may bepleased to direct the respondent Nos. 3 to 5 to provide the protection to life and liberty of the petitioners father and his family members and not to harass the petitioners father and family members pending disposal of the writ petition.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl. RAPOLU BHASKAR
Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 to 5: Gp FOR HOME
Counsel for the Respondent Nos.6 to j3: NONE APPEARED
The Court made the following: ORDER
THE HON'BLB SRI JUSTICE T. VINOD KUMAR
Writ lletition No.17773 of 2O2O
ORDER
Altcr :rr-grring, th(' n)irlt('r' ibr sonrc lirre, t.he li:arned ct>unscl lirr thr: petitione rs rr or.rlcl st-'ek 1:t-'rmission ol tl-ris Court to u,ithdrarlr' llrc pr('sc11t u'rit pctition u,ith a Hbcrty t.o file fresh u'rit pctiriorl s('ll:iratciv or.r its ou'n merits, secking quashing ol each of thc crirlc lc:qis lt: r'ccl.
(iranting libcrty as sought for, the Writ Petition is dismisscd
:rs,.i,ithdrau,n. No order .)s lo costs. Miscellaneous petitions, il any,
pcndir.rg in t.his u,rit pctition, shall stand closed.
SDIB.SATYAV ASSISTANT REG RAR //TRUE COPY// SECTIO OFFICER
To,
Z. Two CCs to GP fdr Home,HighCourt for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad' tourl
CHR
|h+,-zl
HIGH COURT
DATED:0211212020
ORDER
W.P.No.17773 of 2020
1HE sf4
(
o 16 DEC200 z
c
TC!'! E0 *
DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COTS
,"S<br>\e)
\ ) / -rO
-./ - ,-
\ \I-'
uV\ l\ -
,,\A-\l
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the High Court should issue writ order for protection of the petitioner's father and family members from false criminal cases and encounter-related threats.
5 provisions across 2 enactments
Ril15fr 31*i,?1t3ilt:::i:,',f,'J#":ffi i""'
T. Vinod Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
