Dismissed

M/S.Sanghi Spinners India Ltd. and 2 Others v. State of Ts., Rep. by P.P. and Another

Telangana HC10 Sept 2020CRLP/17275/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court dismissed a criminal petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. under the Trial Court for quashing a complaint because the trial court had already concluded with a contested conviction, rendering the petition infructuous.

What did the court decide?

The criminal petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. was dismissed as infructuous and all pending miscellaneous petitions were closed.

M/S.Sanghi Spinners India Ltd. and 2 Others Vs State of… — Quashing and FIR | Telangana HC (2020)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

¶2

THURSDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF SEPTEIVBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY

¶3

PRESENT

¶4

THE HONOURABLE SRIJUSTICE K. LAKSHMAN

¶5

CRIMINAL PETITION NO:^'17275 OF 2016

¶6

Between:

¶7

M/s Sanghi Spinners lndia Limited, Having its regd Office at Sanghi Nagar, Koheda Village, Hayathnagar (M), Ranga Reddy District, represented by its t/anaging Directors

¶8

Amit Sanghi, S/o. Late Anand Prakash Sanghi, Occ: Business, R/o.5-3-565, Road No.12, Banjara Hills, Hyderabad.

¶9

Swati Sanghi, S/o. Late Anand Prakash Sanghi, Occ: Business, R/o.5-3-565, Road No.1 2, Banjara Hills, Hyderabad.

¶10

... Petitioners/Accused 1 to 3

¶11

AND

¶12

State of Telangana, represented by Public Prosecutor, High Court, Hyderabad.

¶13

Registrar of Companies, for Andhra Pradesh and Telangana, ll Floor, Corporate Bhavan, Bandlaguda, Nagole, Hyderabad- 500068

¶14

...Respondents

¶15

Petition under Section 482 ol Cr.P .C praying that in the circumstances stated in the l,4emorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be^pleased to quash the C.C No. 181 ol 2016 on the file of the Hon'ble Special Judge for Economic Offences, Nampally, Hyderabad, as against the Petitioners herein

¶16

l.A. NO: 2 OF 2016(CRLPMP. NO:^'t9397 OF 2016)

¶17

Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C^praying that in the circumstances stated in the [\r]emorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be^pleased pleased to grant interim further proceedings in CC No.181 ol 2016 on the file of the Hon'ble Special Judge for Economic Offences, Nampally, Hyderabad, including the appearance of Hyderabad, including the appearance of the^{petitioners herein,} pending disposal of the above Criminal Petition

¶18

This Petition coming on for hearing, upon^perusing the Memorandum^of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri C.^Raghu, Advocate for the Petitioners and the Public Prosecutor on behalf of the^Respondent No.1 and for the Respondent No.2 not appearing in^person or by Advocate

¶19

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶20

THE HON'BLE JUSTICE K.LAKSHMAN

¶21

CRIMINAL PETITION No.L7275 of 2O16

¶22

ORDER:

¶23

Learned Public Prosecutor placed on record the photo copy of the case details of the subject matter and the same is made as part of the record.

¶24

From a perusal of the same, it is revealed that the subject case in the trial Court ended as 'Contested Convicted' and the sa,rne .!'as disposed of on 1 1.O9.2077 . ln vieu, of the same, the subject matter in the Criminal Petition has become infructuous.

¶25

Accordingly, this Criminal Petition is dismissed as infructuous.

¶26

Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this criminal

¶27

petition, sha1l stand closed.

¶28

Sd/.B.SA ATHI ASSISTAN ISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECT N OFFICER

¶29

To,

¶30

The Special Judge for Economic Offences,^{Nampally, Hyderabad} 2. Two CCs to Public Prosecutor,^{High Court for the State of Telangana' at} Hyderabad [OUT]

¶31

One CC to Sri C. Raghu, Advocate IOPUC]

¶32

Two CD Copies

HIGH COURT

KLJ

DATED: 1010912020

STATS
1l stPz$2$
.ir

ORDER

CRLP.No.17275 of 2016

¶40

DISMISSING THE CRIMINAL PETITION AS INFRUCTUOUS

¶41

/i
I

M/S.Sanghi Spinners India Ltd. and 2 Others v. State of Ts., Rep. by P.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M/S.Sanghi Spinners India Ltd. and 2 Others v. State of Ts., Rep. by P.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Vemula Ram Reddy, Vs The State of Telangana

Ahmed Balala and 4 Others Vs P Chandra Shekar and Another

G.Krishna Goud Vs the State of Telangana.,Rep.,Pp

M/S Sanghi Spinners India Ltd. and 2 Others Vs State of Ts., Rep. by P.P. and Another

M.S.Bhanushri Vs the State of Telangana and Another

M/S Sanghi Spinners India Ltd. and 2 Ors. Vs State of Ts., Rep. by P.P. and Another