Dismissed

Ahmed Balala and 4 Others v. P Chandra Shekar and Another

Telangana HC9 Sept 2020CRLP/6656/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. sought quashing of proceedings. The Court held that the underlying trial proceedings had become 'uncontested-transferred' and were disposed of in 2013, rendering the present petition infructuous. Consequently, the Criminal Petition was dismissed.

What did the court decide?

Disposal of CC No. 293 of 2012 occurred in 2013; Hence, the present Bail Petition is dismissed as infructuous.

Ahmed Balala and 4 Others Vs P Chandra… — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Telangana HC (2020)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE^{STATEOF TELANGANA} AT HYDERABAD

¶2

WEDNESDAY, THE NINTH DAY OF SEPTEIVBER TWO THOUSAND AND^TWENTY

¶3

PRESENT

¶4

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K,LAKSHMAN

¶5

CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 6656 OF 2017

¶6

Betwee n:

¶7

Ahmed Balala, S/o Abdullah Bin Ahmed, aged about 38^{years, Occ: MLA, R/o.} I,4achil ikaman, Pathar Gatti, Hyderabad.^(A-5)

¶8

Smt. Yasmeen Sultana, W/o Mohd. Saleem, aged about 55^{years, Occ:} Corporator, R/o. H.No.1 1-4-361, Red Hills, Hyderabad.^(4-6) ,

¶9

Syed Aleem, S/o Late Syed Yousuf, aged about 46^years, Occ : Business,^R/o. H.No.'1 6-8-385/23, Kaladera colony, Hyderabad.^(A-B)

¶10

4, Jameeluddin Ahmed @ Jamaluddin, S/o Nazimuddin Ahmed, aged 48^years, Occ. Business, R/o H. No.'19-2-35911114, Chandulal Baradari, Hyderabad.^(A-9)

¶11

lt4ohd, Nazeerruddin @ Nazeer, S/o late M.A. Aziz, aged 66^years, R/o H.No.1'14-5812, Bazarghat, Hyderabad (A-1 5)

¶12

...PETITIONERS/ACCUSED Nos.s,6,8,9 & 15

¶13

AND

¶14

P Chandra Shekar, S/o not known to the petitioners, Occ. Ex-Vice Chairman & IVanagrng Director of A.P.State It4inorities Finance Corporatron, Haj Houes, Nampally, Hyderabad.

¶15

The State of Telangana, rep. by its Public Prosecutor, High Court of Judicature at Hyd e ra bad.

¶16

...OEFACTO COMPLAINANT/RESPONDENTS

¶17

Petition under Seclion 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the lt4emorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to quash the proceedings in C.C.No. 293 of 2012 on the file of the First Additional Ch ief Metropolita n l,4agistrate, Na mpal ly, Hydera bad,

¶18

CRLPMP. NO: 6869 OF 2017

¶19

Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the L4emorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition,the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings including the appearance of the petitioners in C.C.No. 293 of 2012 on the file of the First Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Hyderabad, pending disposal of the main Crl. Petition,

¶20

This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the lr/emorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri A Ravi Shankar, Advocate for the Petitioners and the Public Prosecutor, on behalf of the Respondent No.2 and of the Respondent No.1 not appearing in person or by Advocate.

¶21

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶22

TI{E HON'BLE JUSTICE K.LAKSH}IA\

¶23

CII.IMINAL PITITI ON No.6656 of 2017

¶24

OIiDER:

¶25

Learned Public Prosecutor placed on record the photo copy ol the case details ol the subject lnatter and the same is rnade as part ol' the record.

¶26

From a perusal of the san-re, it is revealed that the sr,rbject case in the trial Court ended as 'uncontested-transfbrred' and the same was disposed of on 18-04-2013 and therefore, the sub.ject matter in the Criminal Petition has become infi'uctuous.

¶27

Accordingly, the Crirninal Petition is dismissed as inll'uctuous.

¶28

Nliscellaneous petitions, if any', pending in this criminal

¶29

petition. shall stand closed.

¶30

o' ' o'5.YSiKSlE^{: EH+[kH}

¶31

//TRUE^COPY// SECTI,ON^OFFICER

¶32

i * q'rffittrtri'ti^{:i:*:r'" "" "' "'} Hvderabad^{IOU ll} 5 Two^{CD CoPies} JR

z-?

HIGH COURT

KL,J

DATED:0910912020

1 e 14:
(
e
J
z
.J 15 SEPzM
* ^+

¶38

ORDER

¶39

CRLP.No.6656 of 2017

¶40

DISMISSING^{THE CRIMINAL PETITION} AS INFRUCTUOUS

¶41

Ahmed Balala and 4 Others v. P Chandra Shekar and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ahmed Balala and 4 Others v. P Chandra Shekar and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Azmath , Mohammed Azmathullah Khan Vs The State of Telangana

R.Rama Koteshwar Rao Vs The State of Telangana and Another

Jadhav Santosh Vs The Additional Assistant Director

Movva Satyanarayana, R.R.Dt., Vs the State of Telangana, Rep Pp and Anr.

Vemula Ram Reddy, Vs The State of Telangana

G.Krishna Goud Vs the State of Telangana.,Rep.,Pp