Court disposed of a writ petition challenging the bank's seizure of petitioner society's accounts without notice, noting that amounts were paid and seizure was lifted under an interim order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A.RAJASHEKER REDDY WRIT PETITION No. 3690 OF 2019
O R D E R :
This writ petition is filed challenging the action of the respondent No.5 in issuing Prohibitory Orders and Summons Notice vide TS/RO/HYD/21601/T-IV/PDRCNO.6862 & 6864/2018, dated 13.02.2019 to the 7th respondent bank to seize the accounts of the petitioner society, without affording any opportunity or notice to the petitioner and without conducting any enquiry, which in turn seized 17 accounts of the petitioner Society.
Sri P.Venugopal, learned Senior Counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as Sri S.Surender Reddy, learned Standing Counsel for respondents 2 to 5 submits that by virtue of interim order dt.22.02.2019 granted by this Court, the entire amounts have been paid by the petitioner society and in pursuance of the same respondents lifted the seizure of accounts of the petitioner society.
Recording the aforesaid submission, the writ petition is disposed of. No order as to costs.
As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in the writ petition, shall stand closed.
__________________________ A.RAJASHEKER REDDY, J
16.10.2019 t k.
2
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A.RAJASHEKER REDDY
WRIT PETITION No. 3690 of 2019
16.10.2019
tk
petitioner society
respondents 2 to 5
respondent No.5
7th respondent bank
A RAJASHEKER REDDY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
