The Writ Court disposed of Writ Petition No.21414 of 2019 filed against passport issuance irregularity. The court recorded that the petitioner would file a fresh application and directed the 4th respondent to consider the same.
Petitioner directed to file fresh application; 4th respondent directed to consider same.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A.RAJASHEKER REDDY WRIT PETITON No.21414 of 2019
ORDER:
This Writ Petition is filed seeking writ of mandamus declaring the action of the 3rd respondent in not issuing new passport on the application of the petitioner with correct date of birth i.e., 11.06.1966 instead of 11.06.1960 as illegal and arbitrary and for consequential directions.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Smt. Thakur Roop Singh, learned Standing Counsel for
respondents 2 & 4.
Learned Standing Counsel submits the petitioner sought for closure of application and no fresh application is filed.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner will file necessary application before the 4th respondent in the prescribed format.
Recording the submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner, this writ petition is disposed of leaving it open for the petitioner to make fresh application in the prescribed format before the 4th respondent and on such application, the 4th respondent is directed to consider the same and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law.
There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand
closed.
_________________________ A.RAJASHEKER REDDY, J
16-10-2019 kvs
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A.RAJASHEKER REDDY
WRIT PETITON No.21414 of 2019
kvs
Date 16.10.2019.
Petitioner
Respondent 2
Respondent 4
A RAJASHEKER REDDY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
