Disposed

Deva Dudaiah v. The Government of Inida

Telangana HC8 Nov 2019WP/30931/2010

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Single judge order disposing of a writ petition challenging the denial of pension claims under the Swatantra Sainik Samman Pension Scheme, 1980. The court directed the respondent to obtain verification reports from the State Government and consider the remaining claims.

What did the court decide?

Directed the 1st respondent to obtain verification reports from the State Government and consider remaining petitions thereafter.

Deva Dudaiah Vs The Government of Inida — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Telangana HC (2019)

¶1

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A.RAJASHEKER REDDY WRIT PETITION No. 30931 OF 2010

¶2

O R D E R :

¶3

This writ petition is filed challenging the action of the respondent in not considering the claims of the petitioners for grant of pension under ‘Swatantra Sainik Samman Pension Scheme, 1980’ despite compliance of requisite conditions and re-verification reports of Government of A.P.

¶4

This Court on 10.12.2010, while admitting the writ petition granted interim directions to the respondent to consider the claims of the petitioners for grant of pension under ‘Swatantra Sainik Samman Pension Scheme, 1980’, in view of the letters dated 08.07.2005, 03.03.2005, 27.05.2005, 22.02.2005, 19.05.2005, 24.05.2005 and 28.09.2005, within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of copy of the order and pass appropriate orders, in accordance with law.

¶5

Learned Counsel for petitioners submits that by virtue of the interim order, the case of the petitioners 1 and 3 was considered and they were granted pension under ‘Swatantra Sainik Samman Pension Scheme, 1980’; and that the cases of remaining petitioners could not be considered by the State Government on the ground that they have not received verification reports from the State Government.

¶6

Learned Standing Counsel for the respondent also does not dispute the

¶7

same.

¶8

¶9

In view of the aforesaid facts and circumstances, the writ petition is disposed of directing the 1^st respondent to obtain verification report from the State Government as expeditiously as possible, and after receiving the verification report from the State Government, the 1^st respondent shall consider the cases of remaining petitioners, in accordance with the scheme. No order as to costs.

¶10

As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in the

¶11

writ petition, shall stand closed.

¶12

__________________________
A.RAJASHEKER REDDY, J
08.11.2019
t k.

¶13

¶14

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A.RAJASHEKER REDDY

¶15

WRIT PETITION No. 30931 of 2010
08.11.2019

¶16

Deva Dudaiah v. The Government of Inida

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Deva Dudaiah v. The Government of Inida

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Nfc Industrial Workers Union, Vs The Union of India, Rep by its Secretary

Burugu Jayasheeludu Vs Rt. Rev. Dr. K. Ruben Mark

Devaraju Samabamurthy Vs the Union of India, Ministry of Home Affairs

M/s. Sushee Infra Private Ltd. Vs State Bank of India

S Wazeed Baba, Vs Government of India

Syed Zakir Hussain Vs Sri Venkateshwarlu and Another