Order disposing a writ petition challenging a price revision in an NFC Canteen without purported union consultation. Registry notes a counter-affidavit submission and closes the matter without substantive adjudication.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A.RAJASHEKER REDDY WRIT PETITION No. 31800 OF 2013
O R D E R :
This writ petition is filed challenging the action of the respondent No.5 in revising the price of the item provided in the NFC Canteen on 05.11.2013 vide order No.NFC/IR/CNIN/2013/1826, w.e.f.7.11.2013 without consulting the petitioners union.
Learned Counsel for the petitioner states that the revised rates are not
in consultation with his union and thus to continue the old rates.
In the counter affidavit, at para-7, it is stated that the issue has been discussed with the canteen management on 18.08.2012 and thereafter special committee met on 17.11.2012 and recommended for hiking the rates.
Heard Sri Namavarapu Rajeshwar Rao, learned Assistant Solicitor General.
In view of the aforesaid submission in the counter affidavit, recording
the same, the writ petition is disposed of. No order as to costs.
As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in the writ petition, shall stand closed.
A.RAJASHEKER REDDY, J
07.11.2019 t k.
2
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A.RAJASHEKER REDDY
WRIT PETITION No. 31800 of 2013
06.11.2019
tk
Petitioner Union
Respondent No.5
A. Rajasheker Reddy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
