Disposed
Sri E. Madhava Rao v. State of Telangana
Telangana HCWP/2853/2019
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
SRI JUSTICE CHALLA KODANDA RAM WRIT PETITION…
What the court decided
AI extract
SRI JUSTICE CHALLA KODANDA RAM WRIT PETITION…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE CHALLA KODANDA RAM WRIT PETITION No.2853 of 2019
ORDER :
Aggrieved by the inaction of the Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, represented by its Commissioner, in granting building permission to the petitioner, and in returning the building permission application of the petitioner on the ground that land grabbing case in L.G.C.No.29 of 2006 was filed by the Revenue Divisional Officer, Chevella, the present Writ Petition is filed.
Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Government Pleader for respondent No.1, and Sri Sampath Prabhakar Reddy, learned Standing Counsel for respondent Nos.2 and 3.
All the learned counsel submit that this Court in identical set of facts and circumstances in W.P.No.22280 of 2018, dated 02.07.2018, disposed of the Writ Petition with the following direction:
“Following the above orders, this Writ Petition is disposed of, directing respondent Nos.2 and 3 to consider the application of the petitioner for grant of building permission in the subject land within a period of eight (08) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, subject to the petitioner satisfying the requirement of Section 428 of GHMC Act and also giving an undertaking that he would not claim equities or costs of the building construction, in the event LGC has been decided against him, without reference to the letter dated 31.10.2013 of the Zonal Commissioner, GHMC, Hyderabad.”
All the learned counsel submit that the present Writ Petition may also be disposed of accordingly.
Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case and the submissions of the respective counsel, the present Writ Petition
2
is also disposed of in terms of the above directions of this Court in W.P.No.22280 of 2018, dated 02.07.2018.
The miscellaneous petitions pending in this Writ Petition, if any, shall stand closed. There shall be no order as to costs.
____________________________ CHALLA KODANDA RAM, J
14.02.2019 vs
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
W.P.No.22280 of 2018, dated 02.07.2018Followed¶9
PETITIONER
GREATER HYDERABAD MUNICIPAL CORPORATION
RESPONDENT NO.2
RESPONDENT NO.3
CHALLA KODANDA RAM
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court