Disposed

Sri Yerneni Satyanarayana v. State of Telangana

Telangana HC14 Feb 2019WP/2846/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This short order unanimously disposed of W.P.No.2846 of 2019 by adhering to the directions issued in an earlier identical matter (W.P.No.22280 of 2018), directing the GHMC authorities to consider the building permission application subject to specific conditions.

What did the court decide?

Disposal of the Writ Petition in terms of earlier directions in W.P.No.22280 of 2018, dated 02.07.2018.

Sri Yerneni Satyanarayana Vs State of Telangana — Property and Title | Telangana HC (2019)

¶1

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE CHALLA KODANDA RAM WRIT PETITION No.2846 of 2019

¶2

ORDER :

¶3

Aggrieved by the inaction of the Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, represented by its Commissioner, in granting building permission to the petitioners, and in returning the building permission application of the petitioner on the ground that land grabbing case in L.G.C.No.29 of 2006 was filed by the Revenue Divisional Officer, Chevella, the present Writ Petition is filed.

¶4

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners, learned Government Pleader for respondent No.1, and Sri Sampath Prabhakar Reddy, learned Standing Counsel for respondent Nos.2 and 3.

¶5

All the learned counsel submit that this Court in identical set of facts and circumstances in W.P.No.22280 of 2018, dated 02.07.2018, disposed of the Writ Petition with the following direction:

¶6

“Following the above orders, this Writ Petition is disposed of, directing respondent Nos.2 and 3 to consider the application of the petitioner for grant of building permission in the subject land within a period of eight (08) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, subject to the petitioner satisfying the requirement of Section 428 of GHMC Act and also giving an undertaking that he would not claim equities or costs of the building construction, in the event LGC has been decided against him, without reference to the letter dated 31.10.2013 of the Zonal Commissioner, GHMC, Hyderabad.”

¶7

All the learned counsel submit that the present Writ Petition may also be disposed of accordingly.

¶8

Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case and the submissions of the respective counsel, the present Writ Petition

¶9

¶10

is also disposed of in terms of the above directions of this Court in W.P.No.22280 of 2018, dated 02.07.2018.

¶11

The miscellaneous petitions pending in this Writ Petition, if any, shall stand closed. There shall be no order as to costs.

¶12

____________________________ CHALLA KODANDA RAM, J

¶13

14.02.2019 vs

Sri Yerneni Satyanarayana v. State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sri Yerneni Satyanarayana v. State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Revelli Lingaiah Vs The State of Telangana

B.Tulasi Goud Vs State of Telangana

Karidula Suguna Vs The State of Telangana

I.V.Y. League Villas Private Limited, Hyd. Vs Commr, Hmda, Hyd. and Ano.

Dara Narsimha Rao Vs The State of Telangana

Sri E. Madhava Rao Vs State of Telangana