Petitioner challenged order confiscating his vehicle for illegal transportation of toddy, asserting he had submitted explanation which was ignored by the authority without its consideration.
Impugned order dated 20.11.2018 is set aside; liberty granted to 2nd respondent to pass orders afresh after considering the explanation dated 26.02.2018.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE CHALLA KODANDA RAM WRIT PETITION No. 2205 of 2019
ORDER:
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Government Pleader for Prohibition and Excise for respondents.
CKR, J W.P.No.2205 of 2019
2
the petitioner is placed on record, this Court, on 06.02.2019, directed the learned Government Pleader to get instructions as to whether the petitioner has submitted explanation or not.
________________________ CHALLA KODANDA RAM, J
13th February, 2019
sj
1 issue framed by the court
Whether impugned order of confiscation of vehicle can be set aside when petitioner submitted explanation which was not considered by the authority.
Petitioner
2nd Respondent
Challa Kodanda Ram
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
