The writ petitioner died before the conclusion of the proceedings. The court held that no cause of action survives due to the petitioner's death. The writ petition and any miscellaneous petitions were closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P. KESHAVA RAO WRIT PETITION No.26705 of 2010
ORDER:
Learned counsel for the petitioner informs this Court that the
petitioner died.
“…to direct the 1st respondent to initiate action against the 2nd respondent for filling Complaint U/s.498-A IPC and U/s.3(1) and 10 of SCST atrocities act against the petitioner in Crime No.903 of 2006 and issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus, and direct the 1st respondent to initiate the action on the complaint made by the petitioner on 28-01-2009 and pass …”
petitioner, no further cause would survive in the writ petition.
Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. No
costs.
___________________ P. KESHAVA RAO, J
6th November 2019
mar
Petitioner
1st Respondent
2nd Respondent
P. KESHAVA RAO
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
