04.04.2013 and investigation was taken up. During the course of investigation, respondent No.3, being Investigating Officer, examined the complainant and other witnesses and recorded their detailed statements. Investigation was going on in all angles to find out the guilt of the accused. It is also stated in the counter-affidavit that basing on the outcome of investigation, necessary steps will be taken against the concerned accused in the F.I.R. and a final report under Section 173 Cr.P.C. will be filed before the concerned Court by following due process. In fact, the petitioner lodged a complaint on 16.03.2013 with the 3rd respondent stating that a group of persons came to his residence in a car and threatened the tenants to vacate the premises and face grave consequences and hence requested the police to take necessary action as per law. Since the contents of the complaint are non-cognizable in nature, the 3rd respondent entered the same in General Diary of the Station on the same day itself i.e., 16.03.2013, and a requisition was filed before the learned IX Metropolitan Magistrate, Kukatpally at Miyapur, to accord permission to register the case on the non-cognizable complaint filed by the petitioner. The same is pending for consideration before the concerned Court. A copy of the same has been enclosed to the counter-affidavit. Based on the complaint lodged by the petitioner with the respondent, the respondent police asked to the petitioner to come with documentary evidence. But, he did not turn up to the police station and made baseless allegations. It is also further stated in the counter-affidavit that the police called the petitioner and asked
