Petitioner challenged the inaction of the Station House Officer in registering a crime report. The High Court, upon submission that a case was subsequently registered, disposed of the petition without costs and closed pending petitions.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA (Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY ,THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF SEPTEIVBER TWO THOUSAND AND NINETEEN
1H ES
e
o5
ls
(, o
4
RAB
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A.RAJASHEKER REDDY
WRIT PETITION NO: 17402 OF 2019
Between:
Pallerla Achintyam, W/o Yadhagiri Narsiah, aged 50 years, Occ. House Wife, R/o Suryapet Town, and presently H. No. 5-5-1065/81. Road No.3, Bank Colony, Chinthalkunta, Hyderabad.
...PET|T|ONER
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, by declaring the action of the Respondent No.4 in not registering the crime against the Respondent No. 5 to B, basing on the report of the petitioner Dt. 1 1- 06-2019, as illegal, arbitrary and against the principles of naturaljustice and violative of Article 14,19, and 21 of constitution of lndia and consequently to direct the Respondent No. 5 to B to register the crime against the Respondent No.5 to 8, and take necessary action as per law, basing on the report of thepetitioner, Dt.11 -06- 2019
lA NO: 1 OF 2019
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of thepetition, the High Court may bepleased to direct the respondent No- 2 to 5 to register the Crime against the respondent No. 5 to 8, and take necessary action as per law, basing on the report of thepetitioner,Dt.11 -06- 2019, forthwith, pending disposal of the writpetition
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl. RAPOLU BHASKAR
Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 1 to 4: GP FOR HOME(TG)
Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 5 to 8: NONEAPPEARED
The Court made the following: ORDER
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE A.RAJASHEKER REDDY
WRIT PETITION No. 17402 of 2019
ORDER:
This writ petition is filed challenging the action of respondent No.4 in not registerin.g the crime against respondents 5 to 8, basing on the repo( ofthe petitioner dt.11.06.2019.
Learned Assisrant Govemment Pleader for Ho roduced t written instructions dt.14.08.2019 stating that basing on the complaint of the petitioner a case in Crime No.522l2019 is registered under Sections 447,421,504,509,384 and 506 r/w.i20(B) IPC on the file of Medipally Police Station, on 14.08.2019.
Recording the aforesaid submission, the writ petition is disposed of. No order as to costs.
As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in
the writ petition, shali stand closed.
SD/-CH.VENKATESWARULU ASSISTANT REGI
//TRUECOPY'
l
SECTIONOFFICER
to'',. ,nu Principal Secretary' Home Department' State of Telangana' Secretariat' '?x3"r3'#.".""'"itt#illf,llii;H{,fl{$;H.t[*il;-",,,3, TheDePutYCommisl 4 The StationHouse u
5 One CC toSri RaPo
a fwo CCsto GP forF Hvderabad(OUT)
z. two CDCoPies
mbs rS '*--
HIGH COURT
DATED:13/09/2019
ORDER
o* ,J,.
L!
/-\o
2 4 Si:P 2019
.i):
WP.No.17402 of 2019
DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS
s:'J ' ^ t-P't'. )-,-:\tpt\
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Pallerla Achintyam
The State of Telangana
Commissioner of Police, Rachakonda Police Commissionerate
Deputy Commissioner of Police, Malkajgiri
The Station House Officer, Medipally, Hyderabad
Regoti Laxmaiah
A. Rajasheker Reddy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
