V. Purnachandra Rao v. N.Y.Giri
Case brief
What is this about?
The petitioner moved in a contempt case seeking closure of proceedings after respondents complied with Right to Information Act directions. The Single Judge held the court closed.
What did the court decide?
Contempt Case No. 336 of 2019 and pending miscellaneous petitions were closed. No order as to costs.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A.RAJASHEKER REDDY CONTEMPT CASE No. 336 of 2019
O R D E R :
Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that no further orders are required to be passed in the Contempt Case as the respondents in compliance of the directions of this Court conducted survey, furnished report to the petitioner under Right Information Act and also filed the report before this Court.
Recording the aforesaid submission of learned counsel for the
petitioner, Contempt Case is closed. No order as to costs.
As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in the writ petition, shall stand closed. ___________________________ A.RAJASHEKER REDDY, J 13.09.2019 t k.
2
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A.RAJASHEKER REDDY
CONTEMPT CASE No.336 of 2019
13.09.2019
tk
Parties & counsel
- applicant
petitioner
- respondent
respondents
Coram
A.RAJASHEKER REDDY
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Telangana HC
- Decided on
- · September
- Registered
- Case no.
- CC/336/2019
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court