Petitioner filed two backup petitions in the High Court seeking quashing of an academic suspension against them. The court recorded an admission that the petitioner had withdrawn the writ petition and dismissed it accordingly without costs.
No specific relief granted; petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA (Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY ,THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF SEPTEIVBER IWO THOUSAND AND NINETEEN
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A.RAJASHEKER REDDY
WRIT PETITION NO: 10137 OF 2018
Between:
B.Venkata Krishna, S/o. B.Venkateshwarlu, Aged 20 Years, Occ- Student, R/o. 6- 3212, Swamy Narayana Colony, Gurramguda Village, Balapur Mandal, Ranga Reddy District R.R.DIST
...PETITIONER
AND
.,.RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other writ, order, or direction declarrng the circular of the 2nd Respondent dated 21 .02.2018 suspending the Petitioner from attending class work for ll B.Tech ll Semester of 2017-2018 as being illegal, arbitrary, u nconstitutio na I and contrary to the regulations of university apart from being violative of Principles of Natural Justice and consequently set aside the same
lA NO:'l OF 2018
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 2nd Respondent to permit the Petitioner to write internal exams scheduled to be conducted from 28.03.2018 for B.Tech ll Semester of 2017-2018
lA NO: 2 OF 2018
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the impugned circular dated 21 .02.2018 suspending the Petitioner from attending class work for ll B.Tech ll Semester of 2017-2018
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl. P SRI HARSHA REDDY
Counsel forthe Respondent No.1: SRI V.RAMCHANDER GOUD SC FOR JNTU
Counsel for the Respondent No.2: NONE APPEARED
The Court made the following: ORDER
t,
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A. RAJASHEKER REDDY
WRIT PI!,TITION No.101 37 0F 2018
ORDER:
Learned counsel fur the petitioner filed letter dated 11.09.2019
seeking permission to withdraw this Writ Petition.
There shall be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous Petitions pending,
if any, shall stand closed.
I
//TRUE COPY'
SD/.CH.VENKATESWAR ULU ASSISTANTREGIST RAR u SECTIONOFFI CER
To, . One CC to Sri P SriHarshaReddyAdvoca-t"-tQ?-qQl ^ . One EE i" sIi'n.nrrcnrnde,oorio (SCronLrurU)' Advocate'(oPUC) 23. Two CD Copies mbs ISv
HIGH COURT
DATED:1310912019
\
ORDER
E STA re
1tr
t<br>,l
o
orJl 2[ SFPMT
}1. f
* +
re9
oEspa:TC<br>.t_:=
WP.No.10137 of 2018
DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS
s-&].r.r,
Ju *\t\r"tt
B.Venkata Krishna
Jawaharlal Nehru Technological University, Kukatpally, Hyderabad
CVR College of Engineering, Vastunagar
A.Rajasheker Reddy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
