M.Shankar Babu v. M.Archana
Case brief
What is this about?
This single-judge court dismissed an appeal against a Family Court order due to the non-prosecution by the appellant's counsel.
What did the court decide?
Summons to the lower court for judgment under Rule 11, Order XXXIX, CPC.
What the court decided
High Court for the State of Telangana
The Hon'ble Sri Justice Raghvendra Singh Chauhan
and
The Hon’ble Sri Justice T.Amarnath Goud F.C.A. No.156 of 2006
Date: 11-03-2019
Between:
M. Shankar Babu
…Appellant
and
M. Archana
…Respondent
Counsel for the appellant: None present
Counsel for the respondent: Mr. G. Sudarsan for
Mr. K.S. Murthy
The Court made the following:
RSC, J & TA, J FCA.No.156 of 2006 Dt: 11-03-2019
2
Judgment: (per Hon’ble Sri Justice Raghvendra Singh Chauhan)
This Appeal is filed against the order and decree dated 23-11-2006, in FCOP.No.199 of 2004, on the file of the Judge, Family Court at Secunderabad.
By order dated 04-02-2019, this Court had made it amply clear that in case the learned counsel for the appellant is not present on the next date of hearing, this appeal shall be dismissed for non-prosecution. Even today, the learned counsel for the appellant is absent.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
M. Shankar Babu
- respondent
M. Archana
Coram
Raghvendra Singh Chauhan
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Telangana HC
- Decided on
- · March
- Registered
- Case no.
- FCA/156/2006
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court