This order disposed of the writ petition by relying on a common order passed in pending matters. The court held that the issue was covered in the earlier order dated 22.02.2016, and no costs were awarded. No substantive legal proposition was laid down.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE U. DURGA PRASAD RAO
Writ Petition No.7047 of 2009
ORDER:
The petitioners seek a writ of Mandamus declaring the impugned order passed by the 2nd respondent in Rc.No.C2.1407/M/2008-4, Rc.No.C2.1407/M/2008-23, Rc.No.C2.1407/M/2008-24, Rc.No.C2.1407/M/2008-21, Rc.No.C2.1407/M/2008-22, Rc.No.C2.1407/M/2008-19, Rc.No.C5.1405/M/2008-13, Rc.No.C2.1408/M/2008-14, Rc.No.C2.1407/M/2008-20, Rc.No.C2.1407/M/2008-28, Rc.No.C2.1407/M/2008-26, Rc.No.C5.1405/M/2008-16, Rc.No.C2.1407/M/2008-2, Rc.No.C2.1407/M/2008-8, Rc.No.C5.1405/M/2008-25, Rc.No.C2.1408/M/2008-7, Rc.No.C5.1404/M/2008-14, Rc.No.C5.1404/M/2008-16, Rc.No.C5.1404/M/2008-15, Rc.No.C5.1405/M/2008-22, Rc.No.C2.1408/M/2008-15, Rc.No.C5.1405/M/2008-1, Rc.No.C2.1408/M/2008-17, Rc.No.C5.1404/M/2008-6, Rc.No.C2.1408/M/2008-11, Rc.No.C2.1407/M/2008-12, Rc.No.C5.1404/M/2008-8, Rc.No.C2.1407/M/2008-16, Rc.No.C2.1407/M/2008-15 and Rc.No.C5.1405/M/2008-2, dated 28.02.2009, 09.03.2009 and 04.03.2009 as illegal null void.
As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed.
_________________________ U. DURGA PRASAD RAO, J
Date: 06.09.2018 Murthy
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
W.P.Nos.5805 and 9008 of 2009Followed¶5
Petitioners
Government Pleader for Home
2nd Respondent
U. DURGA PRASAD RAO
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
