The Court dismissed the Writ Petition challenging the non-consideration of a representation regarding the pendency of an appeal. Upon noting that the related Second Appeal was dismissed by this Court, it held that no relief could be granted.
No relief granted. Writ Petition dismissed. No order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A.V.SESHA SAI
WRIT PETITION No.31881 OF 2018
ORDER :
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned
Government Pleader for Municipal Administration and Urban Development, appearing for the first respondent, and Sri Sampath Prabhakar Reddy, learned Standing Counsel for GHMC, appearing for respondent Nos.2 to 4 respectively, apart
from perusing the entire material available on record.
The non-consideration of the representation, dated 11.05.2018 (acknowledged by the respondents on 14.05.2018), of the petitioner herein, is under challenge in the present Writ Petition. The said representation refers to the pendency of S.A.No.146 of 2018.
During the course of hearing, learned counsel for the unofficial respondent No.5 has brought to the notice of this Court that the said Second Appeal also came to be dismissed by way of a judgment of this Court, dated 03.08.2018. A copy of the same is placed on record.
An order passed in W.P.No.20971 of 2018 is also placed on record, wherein this Court, while dismissing the Writ Petition, kept it open for the petitioner to avail the remedies under law.
2
In view of the same, no relief, in this Writ Petition, can be granted.
Accordingly, Writ Petition is dismissed. There shall be no
order as to costs.
As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if
any, shall stand closed.
__________________ A.V.SESHA SAI, J 27th September, 2018 Tsy
2 issues framed by the court
Whether a representation filed by the petitioner regarding pendency of an appeal deserves reconsideration when the underlying appeal has already been dismissed by this Court.
Whether any relief can be granted in the writ petition given the dismissal of the related Second Appeal and a previous writ petition.
The Petitioner
Government Pleader for Municipal Administration and Urban Development
GHMC
A.V.Sesha Sai
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
