Allowed

Smt.Gutta Leela v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

Telangana HC26 Sept 2018WP/19098/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court granted a Writ of Mandamus directing the 7th Respondent to arrange a detailed joint survey involving the Revenue, Survey & Land Records, and Forest Departments regarding a proposed quarry lease to resolve boundary disputes.

What did the court decide?

Directed the 7th Respondent to arrange a detailed Joint Survey with Revenue and Survey & Land Records Departments within three months, giving notice to the petitioner.

Smt.Gutta Leela Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh — Writ and Judicial Review | Telangana HC (2018)

¶1

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A.V.SESHA SAI WRIT PETITION No.19098 of 2018

¶2

ORDER:

¶3

The Writ Petition is filed for the following relief:-

¶4

“… to pass Order or orders or direction, more particularly, one in the nature of a Writ of Mandamus declaring the inaction of the respondents No.3 and 4 in not conducting the Joint inspection and submitting the report with respect to the proposed Quarry lease of the petitioner for an extent of 4.950 Hcts., in Sy.No.559/18 in Chandramakula Palli village, Punganooru Mandal, Chittoor District, as illegal, arbitrary and vilation of the petitioner’s rights guaranteed under Articles 14, 19 (1)(g) and 21 of the Constitution of India and to pass……”

¶5

A counter affidavit, deposed by the Divisional Forest Officer, Chittoor West Division, Chittoor/R.3 herein is filed. Paragraph No.6 of the said counter affidavit reads as under:-

¶6

“In reply to para Nos.8 to 10 of the affidavit and as explained supra, it is submitted that there are disputes and practical problems in fixing the boundary of the block area and requires to conduct detailed survey jointly with Revenue and Survey & Land Records Departments from the beginning point to the end point and arrive the facts and factual figures and make full exercise by the Forest Department about the losses. Then submit detailed report with full justification duly explaining the fact along with joint inspection report to the Government and Orders obtained.”

¶7

In view of the said averments in the counter affidavit of the Divisional Forest Officer/R.3 herein and to have a quietus for this issue, this Court deems it appropriate to dispose of the Writ

¶8

¶9

Petition, with a direction to the 7^th respondent herein to arrange for the detailed Joint Survey with the Revenue, Survey & Land Records and Forest Departments, and to take further action, strictly in accordance with law, after giving notice to the petitioner. The said exercise shall complete within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this Order.

¶10

Miscellaneous Petitions pending consideration, if any, in this Writ Petition shall stand closed. There shall be no order as to costs.

¶11

_________________________
JUSTICE A.V.SESHA SAI
Date :26.09.2018
Smr

Smt.Gutta Leela v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Smt.Gutta Leela v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Nambi Hanumanthu , Kuruva Hanumanthu, Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh

H. Imam Sab, Vs State of Andhra Pradesh

Viswa Wines Vs State of Ap

Janakamma Vs State of Telangana

Pratap Reddy Vs State of Telangana

MikkiliJayakar, Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh