The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking a restraining order against religious preaching by respondent No.8. The Hon'ble Court held that the cause of action does not survive as the relevant period had already elapsed, and disposed of the petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A.RAJASHEKER REDDY
W.P.NO.27737 OF 2018
O R D E R
Aggrieved by the inaction of official respondents 1 to 7 in considering the representations of the petitioner dated 31.05.2018 and 03.08.2018, for restraining the respondent No.8 from conducting religious preaching during the period from 7.08.2018 to 15.08.2018, the present writ petition is filed.
Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri K.Lakshman, learned Assistant Solicitor General, representing the Union of India and the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home.
The period during which the religious preaching was sought to be restrained, already elapsed, and in view of the same, cause in the writ petition does not survive.
Accordingly the writ petition is disposed of.
Interlocutory applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. No
costs.
---------------------------------------- A.RAJASHEKER REDDY,J DATE:27—08—2018
AVS
PETITIONER
OFFICIAL RESPONDENTS 1 TO 7
RESPONDENT NO.8
UNION OF INDIA
A.RAJASHEKER REDDY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
