Disposed

Devata Praveen Kumar v. State of Andhra Pradesh

Telangana HC27 Aug 2018WP/25350/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

A single-judge Supreme Court order directing the 2nd respondent to dispose of the petitioner's appeal under the Senior Citizens Maintenance Welfare Act, 2007, within two months, while mandating an interim maintenance deposit.

What did the court decide?

Direction to the 2nd respondent to dispose of the appeal within two months and order for interim maintenance deposit of Rs. 5,000 per month.

Devata Praveen Kumar Vs State of Andhra… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Telangana HC (2018)

¶1

HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A.RAJASHEKER REDDY WRIT PETITION No.25350 OF 2018

¶2

O R D E R :

¶3

This writ petition is filed challenging the action of the 2^nd respondent in not disposing of the stay petition as also the appeal filed by the petitioner under Section 16 of the Senior Citizens Maintenance Welfare Act, 2007, against the orders passed by the 3^rd respondent in R.C.B.No.1792/2017, dated 13.03.2018.

¶4

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the 3^rd respondent issued notice to the petitioner on the application filed by the 4^th respondent which is numbered as R.C.B.No.1792/2017; and that the petitioner also filed counter stating that he has settled some properties worth Rs.60 lakhs in favour of 4^th respondent and also provided residence to the 4^th respondent; but, without considering the said facts the 3^rd respondent passed order dated 13.03.2018 directing the petitioner to pay Rs.10,000/- per month towards maintenance of the 4^th respondent; and that aggrieved by the same petitioner filed appeal before the 2^nd respondent on 07.04.2018. He also submits that in pursuance to the appeal filed by the petitioner the 2^nd respondent issued notice to the petitioner vide R.C.No.C/282/2016, dated 05.05.2018 for production of documents and in pursuance of the same the petitioner also produced the documents. But, till date no orders are passed in the appeal.

¶5

¶6

On the other hand learned Government Pleader for Women Development and Child Welfare submits that though the 3^rd respondent directed the petitioner to pay maintenance to the 4^th respondent of Rs.10,000/- every month, petitioner has not paid any amounts to the 4^th respondent.

¶7

Having regard to the aforesaid facts and circumstances, since the appeal filed by the petitioner is pending before the 2^nd respondent, the 2^nd respondent is directed to dispose of the appeal filed by the petitioner within two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order after issuing notice to the petitioner and 4^th respondent, in accordance with law. Till disposal of the said appeal, the petitioner shall deposit an amount of Rs.5,000/- per month towards maintenance of the 4^th respondent and 4^th respondent is permitted to withdraw the same without furnishing any security.

¶8

Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. No order as to costs.

¶9

As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in the writ petition, shall stand closed.

¶10

_______________________________ A.RAJASHEKER REDDY, J

¶11

27.08.2018 t k.

Devata Praveen Kumar v. State of Andhra Pradesh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Devata Praveen Kumar v. State of Andhra Pradesh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ayyanna College of Teacher Education Sponsared by Ayyanna Educational Society Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh

Punyagiri College of Education, Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh

Smt.a.Susheelamma Vs State of Telangana

Mr.D.Srikanth Reddy Vs Assistant P.F.Commissioner

Boddu Sudesh Reddy Vs The Commissioner of Central Tax

K.Karuna Sagar, Vs The Union of India