The High Court dismissed a writ petition filed by a petitioner aggrieved by the Deputy Commissioner of Central tax's refusal to receive their technical bid, noting the bid had already been considered and rejected via prior intimation.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A.RAJASHEKER REDDY
W.P.NO.26319 OF 2018
O R D E R
Aggrieved by the inaction of 2nd respondent – Deputy Commissioner of Central tax, in refusing to receive the technical bid of the petitioner, present writ petition is filed.
Learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the respondents, submit that technical bid of the petitioner was considered and rejected, and 2nd respondent also intimated the same to the petitioner vide letter dated 01.06.2018.
In view of the above representation, cause in the writ petition does not survive and the same is accordingly dismissed.
Interlocutory applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. No
costs.
------------------------------------------------ A.RAJASHEKER REDDY,J
DATE:27—08—2018
AVS
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition challenges the refusal by the Deputy Commissioner of Central tax to receive the petitioner's technical bid.
Petitioner
Deputy Commissioner of Central tax
A.RAJASHEKER REDDY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
