This petition challenged the dispossession of land by respondents 2 to 4. The court recorded the respondent government pleader's submission that there was no interference by respondents 1 to 4 and disposed of the petition with advice to approach resident No. 5 in case of dispute.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A.RAJASHEKER REDDY WRIT PETITON No.22511 of 2018
ORDER:
This writ petition is filed aggrieved by the action of respondents 2 to 4 in dispossessing the petitioners from their land to an extent of Ac.6-32 cents in Sy.No.163/2 and Ac.1-85 cents in Sy.No.166/2 situated in B.Velamkota Village, Rampachodavaram Mandal, East Godavari District.
Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue produced written instructions given by the 3rd respondent and submits that respondents 1 to 4 are not interfering with the possession of the petitioners in respect of the subject land and he submits that if respondent No.5 interferes into the possession of petitioners, they can agitate against him.
Recording the said submission, the writ petition is disposed of. However, if the petitioners have any dispute with respondent No.5, it is open for them to avail remedies available to them.
As a sequel to the disposal of this petition, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed.
_________________________ A.RAJASHEKER REDDY,J
31-07-2018 Nvl
2
3
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the writ petition alleging dispossession of landongs to be allowed.
Whether respondents 1 to 4 are liable for interfering with petitioners' possession.
Petitioners
Respondents 2 to 4
A. RAJASHEKER REDDY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
