The bench set aside an order passed without providing an opportunity of hearing, thereby violating principles of natural justice. The writ petition was allowed to the extent of setting aside the impugned order.
The impugned order dated 31.05.2018 was set aside. The writ petition was allowed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A.RAJASHEKER REDDY WRIT PETITION No.21074 of 2018
ORDER:
This Writ Petition, under Article 226 of the Constitution of
India, is filed seeking the following relief:
“to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Certiorari declaring the orders of the 2nd respondent in F.No.19 (3) / Hyderabad/ RD(SER)/Sec.140/2018 dated 31.05.2018 (received by the petitioner on 5th June 2018) as illegal, arbitrary, violative of principles of natural justice and quash the same.”
impugned order.
respondent No.3, the Writ Petition is allowed to the extent indicated above.
Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this writ petition shall stand closed.
A.RAJASHEKER REDDY, J JULY 31, 2018 YVL
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A.RAJASHEKER REDDY
WRIT PETITION No.21074 of 2018
Date:31.07.2018
YVL
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the impugned order passed without an opportunity of hearing violates the principles of natural justice.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Petitioner
Respondent 1
Respondent 2
Respondent 3
A.RAJASHEKER REDDY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
