Criminal Revision closed as the main case was ended in acquittal for A1 and the case against A2 was discharged, rendering the revision infructuous. Liberty granted to pursue recourse as per law.
Closed the criminal revision case and granted liberty to the petitioner to pursue recourse as per law.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE U.DURGA PRASAD RAO
CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No.1592 OF 2011
ORDER:
When the matter came up for orders, it is brought to the notice of this Court that the main case C.C.No.350 of 2011 was ended in acquittal so far as A1 is concerned and the case against A2 was split up and numbered as C.C.No.328 of 2014. Subsequently, as per the order dated 08.09.2017, the case against A2 was discharged giving liberty to the police to reopen the case as and when A2 was produced. In that view of the matter, the present criminal revision case became infructuous and therefore, the same is closed, giving liberty to the petitioner to pursue his recourse as per law.
As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any,
shall stand closed.
___________________________ U.DURGA PRASAD RAO, J
15.11.2018 SS
Petitioner
U.DURGA PRASAD RAO
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
