Single judge summary ordering dismissal of criminal revision challenging conviction under Section 138 NI Act for cheque dishonour, noting no tenable contest and confirming lower court judgment.
Criminal Revision Case No.1060 of 2012 is dismissed confirming the judgment in Crl.A.No.64/2009.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE U.DURGA PRASAD RAO
Criminal Revision Case No.1060 of 2012
ORDER:
Notice sent to the petitioner but no representation on his behalf.
2
complainant filed the complaint. The main defence of the accused was that he lost his money purse on 27.06.2006 in Krishnagiri Mandal, which contained Rs.2,000/- and some important documents including the signed blank cheques and the complainant might have some how obtained those cheques and pressed into service. On that ground he sought for dismissal of the complaint. The said contention was not found favour with the Trial Court and lower Appellate Court and ultimately, he was convicted.
As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed.
_________________________ U. DURGA PRASAD RAO, J
Date: 14.11.2018 scs
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the criminal revision filed by the accused against the conviction and sentence for cheque dishonour under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act should be allowed.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Petitioner/Accused
Complainant
U. DURGA PRASAD RAO
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
