Allowed

Madasu Naga Durga Prasad v. State of A.P.

Telangana HC2 Mar 2018CRLP/2222/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Hon'ble High Court adjudicated a bail petition filed by petitioner accused No.2 in a cheating case. Noting lack of direct allegations and completion of investigation, the Court granted bail subject to personal bond with sureties and police appearance conditions.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner enlarged on bail on executing personal bond of Rs.20,000 with two sureties for Rs.20,000 each appearing police twice weekly till charge sheet.

Madasu Naga Durga Prasad Vs State of A.P. — Cheating and Forgery | Telangana HC (2018)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT HYDERABAO FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA ANO THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH FRIDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF MARCH, TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHTEEN : PRESENT:

¶2

THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE T. RAJANI

¶3

CRLP.No.2222of 2018

¶4

Between:-

¶5

Madasu Naga Durga Prasad, S/o. M. Basava Venkata Nancharaiah.

¶6

AND

¶7

..... Petitioner/Accused No.2.

¶8

State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Public Prosecutor, High Court of Hyderabad at Hyderabad.

¶9

....RespondenVComplainant.

¶10

Petition filed under Sections 437 & 439 Cr.P.C. praying that in the

¶11

circumstances stated in the Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be

¶12

pleased to enlarge the petitioner on bail in FIR No. 644 of 2017,dated 18.09.201 7, of

¶13

SHO, Krishna Lanka.

¶14

The petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the memorandum of grounds

¶15

filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of lr//s. BS Kartik & Prasad

¶16

ESR, Advocates for the Petitioner and of Public Prosecuto(AP) on behalf of

¶17

Respondent-State, the Court made the following ORDER :-

¶18

SMT JUSTICE T.RAJANI

¶19

CRIMINAL PETITION No.2222 OF 2018

¶20

ORDER

¶21

This Criminal Petition is filed seeking for grant of bail to the petitioner, who is accused No.2, in Crime No.644 of 2017 on the file of the Station House Officer, Krishna Lanka Police Station, Vijayawada, Krishna District.

¶22

The offence alleged is under Section 420 of l.P.C

¶23

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondenlstate, and perused the record.

¶24

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that there is no allegation directly made against this petitioner, that he is the person who received amount from the de-facto complainant.

¶25

But, however, learned counsel further submits, that the petitioner is languishing in^jail since 24.01 .2018 and material part of the investigation is completed.

¶26

Learned Public Prosecutor does not refute the said submission of the petitioner's counsel.

¶27

Hence, considering the above, this Court opines that this is a fit case for grant of bail to the petitioner/accused No.2. Accordingly, the Criminal Petition is allowed and the petitioner/accused No.2 is directed to be enlarged on bail on his executing a personal bond for a sum of Rs.20,0001 (Rupees twenty thousand only) with two sureties for a like sum each to the satisfaction of the ll Additional Chief lt4etropolitan Magistrate, Vijayawada, Krishna District. Further, the petitioner/accused

¶28

¶29

No.2 is directed to appear before the Station House Officer, Krishna Lanka

¶30

Police Station, twice in a week r.e., on every Monday and Wednesday in between^'10:00 a.m. and 05:00 p.m., till filing of charge sheet.

¶31

As a sequel, the miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall

¶32

stand closed.

¶33

tx-\

¶34

Sd/ - C.V.MALLIT(AR,JUNA^VARMA ,ASSISTANT

¶35

//TRUE COPY//

¶36

for ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

¶37

¶38

1.The Vll Additional District & Sessions Judge, Vijayawada-cum-lV Additional Ivietropolitan Sessions Judge, Vijayawada, Krishna District.

¶39

2.The ll Additional Chief Metropolitan lt4agistrate, Vijayawada, Krishna District.

¶40

3.The Station House Officer, Krishna Lanka Police Station, Vijayawada City, Krishna District.

¶41

4.The Superintendent, District Jail, Vijayawada, Krishna District.

¶42

s.Two CCs to the Public Prosecutor(AP), High Court at Hyd.(OUT)

¶43

6.One CC to M/s. BS Kartik & Prasad ESR, Advocates(OPuc)

7.One spare copy.

-rvk

DRAFTED BY TKK DT.02-03-2018.

ITIGH COURT

TR.J

DT.02-03-2018.

BAIL ORDER

CRL.P.No. 2222 of 2018

¶54

RELEASE TIIE PETITIONER

¶55

O\ BAIL.

Madasu Naga Durga Prasad v. State of A.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Madasu Naga Durga Prasad v. State of A.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Punam Satyanarayana Dora, Vs the State of a.P., Rep by Pp.

M.Dharma Reddy Vs State of Ap.

Dilip Maithy, Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh

Mikkili Mariyamma Vs State of Ap.

Valaparla Nageshwar Rao Vs State of Ap.

D.Lakshmaiah, Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh