Single judge dismissed a criminal petition seeking modification of bail conditions requiring specific surety locations, holding that the condition could not be altered.
Relief sought for modification of bail condition denied.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
SMT. JUSTICE T.RAJANI
CRIMINAL PETITION No.2151 of 2018
ORDER :
This Criminal Petition is filed under Sections 439(1)(b) and 440(2) of Cr.P.C., for modification of the condition imposed by the XIII Additional District and Sessions Judge (F.T.C.) Vijayawada, in Crl.M.P.No.2159 of 2017 in Cr.No.210 of 2017.
dismissed.
___________ T. RAJANI, J 1st March, 2018
sj
TR,J
2
Crl.P. No.1926 of 2018
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the condition requiring sureties from native and local places of petitioners can be modified when they hail from a different state.
2 provisions across 1 enactments
Petitioners
State
T. RAJANI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
