building. Both the President and the Secretary of the respondentassociation are, presently, working at Amaravathi. While Sri Vedula Venkata Ramana, learned Senior Counsel, would submit that they can always be contacted over phone, Sri J.Kanakaiah, learned counsel for the petitioner, would contend that they are never accessible on phone. It is wholly unnecessary for us to dwell on this issue any longer, as Sri Vedula Venkata Ramana, learned Senior Counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent-contemnor, would fairly state that, in the additional counter-affidavit filed by the respondent-contemnor, it is averred that, if any member wants a room, he could give his particulars and enter the same in the register maintained by the association in the custody of Mr.Afsar or, if any grievance is experienced, a member could contact either the President or the Secretary over phone in respect of accommodation of rooms. Learned Senior Counsel would also submit that the mobile number of Mr.Afsar is ‘998992300’ over which any member of the respondent-association, even if he be a member of the appellant-association, would be entitled to contact and seek accommodation in any of the vacant rooms available in the A.P.NGOs’ Association building.
