Single judge ordered disposal of writ petition by referring to a previous order, directing respondents not to demolish structures without due process of law.
Respondents directed not to demolish the structures of the petitioners without following due process of law.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTI CE A.V.SESHA SAI
W.P. No.32528 OF 2017
ORDER:
It is stated by the learned counsel for the petitioners that the lis in this writ petition is squarely covered by the order of this Court in W.P. No.22169 of 2017 and the same is not disputed by the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue and also Sri Nimmagadda Venkateshwarlu, learned Standing Counsel for 2nd respondent— Municipality.
In view of the submission of the learned counsel for the petitioners, for the reasons alike in the order in W.P. No.22169 of 2017, this writ petition is disposed of directing the respondents not to demolish the structures of the petitioners without following due process of law. There shall be no order as to costs.
Miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs.
__________________ A.V.SESHA SAI, J
Date:21.09.2017 knl
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTI CE A.V.SESHA SAI
W.P. No.32528 OF 2017
Date:21.09.2017
knl
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioners are entitled to be directed to restrain the respondents from demolishing structures without following due process of law.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
W.P. No.22169 of 2017Followed¶4
A.V.SESHA SAI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
