Single-judge writ petition order disposing of a petition where the respondent Corporation stated non-interference with petitioner's construction activity.
No costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A.V.SESHA SAI
WRIT PETITION No.30440 of 2017
Date: 19-09-2017.
BETWEEN:
Teepi Reddy Chokka Reddy
…Petitioner.
AND
The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep by its Principal Secretary, Municipal Administration and Urban Development Dept, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad and others.
...Respondents.
2
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A.V. SESHA SAI
WRIT PETITION No.30440 of 2017
ORDER:
On instructions, it is submitted by the learned Standing Counsel for the respondent-Municipal Corporation that the respondent-municipal authorities have informed him that they are not interfering with the construction activity of the petitioner herein. The same is placed on record.
writ petition, shall stand closed in consequence.
________________________
JUSTICE A.V.SESHA SAI
Date: 19-09-2017
mrb
Teepi Reddy Chokka Reddy
The State of Andhra Pradesh and others
A.V SESHA SAI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
