Allowed
Mudhireddy Prabhakar Reddy v. The State of Telangana
Telangana HCWP/31731/2017
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
SRI JUSTICE A.V.SESHA SAI WRIT PETITION…
What the court decided
AI extract
SRI JUSTICE A.V.SESHA SAI WRIT PETITION…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A.V.SESHA SAI
WRIT PETITION No.31731 of 2017
Date: 19-09-2017.
BETWEEN:
Mudhireddy Prabhakar Reddy
…Petitioner.
AND The State of Telangana and others.
...Respondents.
2
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A.V. SESHA SAI
WRIT PETITION No.31731 of 2017
ORDER:
When the matter is taken up, it is brought to the notice of this Court by the learned Government Pleader for respondents that the issue in the present writ petition is squarely covered by the order of this Court in W.P.No.9570 of 2016, dated 06-04-2017. A copy of the order is placed on record. The operative portion of the said order reads as under:
“In those circumstances, the writ petition is allowed directing the respondent authorities to allow the petitioners forthwith to submit their applications through online and process the same as expeditiously as possible and complete the testing formalities within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order. However, it is made clear that the respondent authorities may take action against the petitioners for furnishing the alleged fake addresses and getting their vehicles registered, in accordance with law. No order as to costs.”
writ petition, shall stand closed in consequence.
_______________________ JUSTICE A.V.SESHA SAI_
Date: 19-09-2017
Note: Office to enclose a copy of the order dated 06-07-2017 in WP No.9570 of 2016. B/O
mrb
Mudhireddy Prabhakar Reddy
The State of Telangana
A.V. SAI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court