Disposed

Mahadeo Saherbrao Ware, S/o. Ware Sahebrao Pangari, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh Rep. by its Principal Secretary

Telangana HC23 Mar 2017WP/10372/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Court disposed of writ petition challenging prohibition of vehicle passage. Directed authorities to issue notice, provide hearing opportunity, and pass orders within two months following established procedures.

What did the court decide?

Directing respondents to put petitioner on notice, grant hearing opportunity, and pass subsequent orders within two months.

Mahadeo Saherbrao Ware, S/o. Ware Sahebrao… — Writ and Judicial Review | Telangana HC (2017)

¶1

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN

¶2

AND

¶3

THE HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE J. UMA DEVI

¶4

WRIT PETITION No. 10372 of 2017

¶5

ORDER: (Per VRS,J)

¶6

The petitioner has come up with the present writ petition, challenging the action of the respondents in prohibiting his vehicle bearing registration No.MH 23W 2986 from passing through their check-post.

¶7

Heard Mr. P. Kamalakar, learned counsel for the petitioner. Mr. Shaik Jeelani Basha, learned special standing counsel for Commercial Taxes (AP), takes notice for the respondents.

¶8

The petitioner challenges the impugned action, on the ground that there is no power conferred upon the respondents under the Act to prevent a vehicle from passing through a check-post. However, the learned special standing counsel relies upon the Circulars, dated 15.09.2015 and 08.08.2016.

¶9

However, we are of the considered view that for the present, we need not go into the larger question of availability of such a power on the part of the respondents. This is in view of the fact that in identical circumstances, this Court has passed orders, directing the respondents to follow a particular procedure. Therefore, following the same, the Writ Petition is disposed of, directing the respondents to put the

¶10

VRS,J & JUD,,J WP No. 10372 of 2017

¶11

¶12

petitioner on notice, give him an opportunity of hearing, and thereafter, pass orders, in accordance with law, within a period of two (2) months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶13

Consequently, miscellaneous petitions if any pending in the writ petition shall stand dismissed. No order as to costs.

¶14

__________________________ V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN, J

¶15

J. UMA DEVI, J. 23^rd March, 2017

¶16

Note: Issue C.C. by tomorrow. (b/o) cbs

¶17

VRS,J & JUD,,J WP No. 10372 of 2017

¶18

¶19

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN  AND

¶20

THE HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE J. UMA DEVI

¶21

Writ Petition No. 10372 of 2017

¶22

(disposed of)

¶23

23^rd March, 2017

¶24

cbs

Mahadeo Saherbrao Ware, S/o. Ware Sahebrao Pangari, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh Rep. by its Principal Secretary

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mahadeo Saherbrao Ware, S/o. Ware Sahebrao Pangari, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh Rep. by its Principal Secretary

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/s.Pooja Coffee Works, Vs Commercial Tax Officer

Jahidaben Badi, Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh

The Commissioner of Income Tax Vs Dr. v. Satyanarayana Reddy

Sree Vala Bellary Channa Basaveswara Cotton Co., Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh

Vithal Mainalle, Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh

Lanka Mohan, Vs The State of A.P.