Court allowed miscellaneous petition as tax effect was below threshold under Circular No.21/2015. Consequently, appeal dismissed as withdrawn while questions of law left unanswered.
Miscellaneous petitions allowed; appeal treated as withdrawn. Questions of law left unanswered.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.RAMASUBRAMANIAN AND
HON’BLE Ms JUSTICE J.UMA DEVI
I.T.T.A.M.P.No.222 of 2007
in/and I.T.T.A.No.292 of 2006
(On being mentioned)
Judgment:
Since the tax effect of the appeal is less than the ceiling limit prescribed under Circular No.21/2015, dated 10-12-2015, the case is not covered by the exceptions under
paras-5 and 8 of the said Circular. Therefore, the miscellaneous petition is allowed and consequently, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. However, the questions of law are left unanswered. The miscellaneous petitions, if any,
pending in this appeal shall stand closed. No costs.
___________________________ V.RAMASUBRAMANIAN, J.
________________ J.UMA DEVI, J.
22nd March, 2017. Ak
2
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.RAMASUBRAMANIAN AND
HON’BLE Ms JUSTICE J.UMA DEVI
I.T.T.A.M.P.No.222 of 2007 in/and I.T.T.A.No.292 of 2006
22nd March, 2017. (Ak)
1 provisions across 1 enactments
V. Ramasubramanian
J. Uma Devi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
