Dismissed

Sree Vala Bellary Channa Basaveswara Cotton Co., v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

Telangana HC23 Mar 2017WP/10312/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner challenged proposed property auction for recovery of sales tax arrears, citing failure to produce accounts in prior civil suit; Court dismissed WP noting assessment order from 2009 was not challenged and auction cancelled due to lack of bidders with no fixed date.

What did the court decide?

Writ petition dismissed; no further date fixed for auction; miscellaneous petitions dismissed.

Sree Vala Bellary Channa Basaveswara Cotton Co… — Writ and Judicial Review | Telangana HC (2017)

¶1

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN

¶2

AND

¶3

THE HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE J. UMA DEVI

¶4

WRIT PETITION No. 10312 of 2017

¶5

ORDER: (Per VRS,J)

¶6

The petitioner has come up with the present writ petition, challenging the proposed auction of their properties for recovery of arrears of sales tax.

¶7

Heard Mr. K.V. Raghuveer, learned counsel for the petitioner. Mr. S. Suribabu, learned special standing counsel for Commercial Taxes (AP), takes notice for the respondents.

¶8

According to the petitioner, they received a notice in the year 2009, but could not produce the books of accounts, as they had been exhibited in a civil suit for recovery of money. They claim that thereafter, they did not receive either any notice or any order of assessment. But, the property is now brought to sale.

¶9

Assuming that no order of assessment was served on the petitioner, even then the petitioner cannot challenge the proposed auction, so long as the assessment order is not under challenge. It is up to the petitioner to obtain copies of the assessment order and take recourse to the remedies available in law. At least, insofar as one assessment year is concerned, the petitioner did, in fact, have an order

¶10

VRS,J & JUD,,J WP No. 10312 of 2017

¶11

¶12

served on them way back in 2009. But, no steps appear to have been taken by them so far.

¶13

In any case, it is stated by the learned special standing counsel that the auction was originally scheduled to be held about six months ago, but got cancelled, due to lack of bidders. No further date is fixed for the auction. Therefore, the Writ Petition is dismissed.

¶14

Consequently, miscellaneous petitions if any pending in the

¶15

writ petition shall stand dismissed. No order as to costs.

¶16

__________________________
V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN, J
______________
J. UMA DEVI, J.
23 rd March, 2017
cbs

¶17

VRS,J & JUD,,J WP No. 10312 of 2017

¶18

¶19

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN  AND

¶20

THE HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE J. UMA DEVI

¶21

Writ Petition No. 10312 of 2017

¶22

(dismissed)

¶23

23^rd March, 2017

¶24

cbs

Sree Vala Bellary Channa Basaveswara Cotton Co., v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sree Vala Bellary Channa Basaveswara Cotton Co., v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/s.Pooja Coffee Works, Vs Commercial Tax Officer

Jahidaben Badi, Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh

The Commissioner of Income Tax Vs Dr. v. Satyanarayana Reddy

Mahadeo Saherbrao Ware, S/o. Ware Sahebrao Pangari, Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh Rep. by its Principal Secretary

Vithal Mainalle, Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh

Lanka Mohan, Vs The State of A.P.