P. Srinivasulu, v. The State of Telangana, Represented by its Principal

Telangana HC12 Apr 2017WP/10142/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This petition sought implementation of an Administrative Tribunal order directing authorities to pass orders on petitioner's representations within four weeks. The court directed the District Collector to pass appropriate orders within four weeks, relying on a prior undertaking by the Advocate General. Pending petitions were closed.

What did the court decide?

District Collector directed to pass appropriate orders on petitioner's representations within four weeks.

P. Srinivasulu, Vs The State of Telangana… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Telangana HC (2017)

¶1

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTI CE SANJAY KUMAR AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTI CE GUDI SEVA SHYAM PRASAD

¶2

WRI T PETI TI ON No. 10142 of 2017

¶3

ORDER: (per Hon’ble Sri Justice Sanjay Kumar)

¶4

This writ petition was filed seeking implementation of the order dated 02.08.2016 passed by the Andhra Pradesh Administrative Tribunal, Hyderabad, in O.A.No.5649 of 2013. By the said order, the Tribunal directed the authorities to pass orders on the representations dated 20.06.2012 and 02.12.2012 made by the petitioner herein, if not already passed, within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of the order.

¶5

Notice having been ordered, the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Services (Telangana) states that no writ petition was filed by the respondent authorities challenging the aforestated order.

¶6

That being so, it is not open to the authorities to fail to implement the order passed by the Tribunal in the light of the undertaking given by the learned Advocate General for the State of Telangana, which was recorded by the Division Bench of this Court comprising the Hon’ble The Acting Chief Justice and the Hon’ble Sri Justice U. Durga Prasad Rao vide order dated 30.09.2016 passed in W.P.No.31905 of 2016 to the effect that the orders passed by the Tribunal, unless varied or set aside, would be invariably implemented.

¶7

The Writ Petition is accordingly disposed of directing the District Collector, Nalgonda District, the second respondent, to pass appropriate orders in accordance with law upon the representations dated 20.06.2012 and 02.12.2012 made by the petitioner. This exercise shall be completed expeditiously and, in any event, not later than four (4) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶8

Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed in the light of this final order. No order as to costs.

¶9

______________________ JUSTI CE SANJAY KUMAR

¶10

Date: 12.04.2017

¶11

__________________________ JUSTI CE G. SHYAM PRASAD

¶12

P. Srinivasulu, v. The State of Telangana, Represented by its Principal

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

P. Srinivasulu, v. The State of Telangana, Represented by its Principal

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mohammed Abdul Suhail Vs The Punjab and Sind Bank

P.Nabi Rasool, Vs State Bank of India

M/s Scrop Bio Medicines Pvt. Ltd., Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh

M. Rosi Reddy Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh

The Andhra Pradesh Public Service Commission, Vs K. Panduranga Reddy

Shaik Razzak Vs Union of India, Rep by its Secretary to Government