Writ petition filed against the respondent bank was dismissed for non-prosecution as the petitioner failed to appear in court on the scheduled date.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. NAGARJUNA REDDY &
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE G. SHYAM PRASAD
W.P.No.27196 of 2016
Date : 22-08-2016
Between: Mohammed Abdul Suhail .. Petitioner
And
The Punjab & Sind Bank, Represented by Authorised Officer/ General Manager, Abids, Hyderabad .. Respondent
Counsel for petitioner : None appeared Counsel for respondent : --
The Court made the following :
ORDER: (per Hon’ble Sri Justice C.V. Nagarjuna Reddy)
This Writ Petition is filed for the following substantive relief :
“ … to issue a writ or direction or an order particularly in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring action of the respondent Bank in issuing the possession notice dated 18-6-2016 against petitioner’s property bearing Flat No.T-2, on Third Floor of Redcon Residency, admeasuring 760 Sq.Ft. (including common areas together with undivided share in the land measuring 20 Sq. Yrds., out of 500 S q . Yds. In premises bearing Municipal No.6-31140/T, situated at JHK Mansion, Somajiguda, Hyderabad as illegal, arbitrary, violation of principles of natural justice and violation of fundamental rights guaranteed under Constitution of India and contrary to the provisions of SARFAESI Act and to set-aside the same …”
On 16-8-2016, the case was adjourned to today at the request of the learned Counsel for the petitioner. Today, when the case was called in the pre-lunch session, there was no representation. Therefore, the case was passed-over. Even in post-lunch session, no one represented the petitioner when the case was
called. Hence, it is reasonable to presume that the petitioner is not interested in pursuing his cause in the Writ Petition.
The Writ Petition is accordingly dismissed for nonprosecution.
As a sequel to the dismissal of the Writ Petition, WPMP No.33693 of 2016 filed for interim relief is dismissed.
________________________ Justice C.V. Nagarjuna Reddy
_______________________ Justice G. Shyam Prasad Date : 22-8-2016
AM
Mohammed Abdul Suhail
The Punjab & Sind Bank
C.V. Nagarjuna Reddy
G. Shyam Prasad
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
