T. Vijay v. The State of Telangana
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court directed the de facto complainant to show cause why the petition seeking withdrawal of a criminal case and transfer of its jurisdiction to another court should not be admitted.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
(sHow GAUSE NOTICE BEFORE ADMISSION) HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT HYDERABAD FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA ANO THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH TUESDAY, THE THIRITIETH DAY OF JANUARY, TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHTEEN
:PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE SHAMEEM AKTHER
TR.CRL.P.No.5 of 2017
Between:
1.KSR Constructions and Real Estates, Rep. by its Managing Partner, K. Srinivas Rao, S/o. Narasimha Rao, FVo. 9-1-43114, YRK Complex, Langer House, Hyderabad.
2.K. Srinivas Ra@. S/o. Narasimha Rao.
3.Kunchala Ramanamma, Wo. Srinivas Rao.
Petitioners.
AND
1.The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Public Prosecutor, High Court at Hyderabad.
..Respondent/Respondent.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
KSR Constructions and Real Estates
- petitioner
K. Srinivas Rao
- petitioner
Kunchala Ramanamma
- respondent
The State of Andhra Pradesh
- respondent
Madala Malyadri
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Telangana HC
- Decided on
- · October
- Registered
- Case no.
- TRCRLP/5/2017
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court