The Single Judge dismissed the Civil Revision Petition as infructuous because the underlying main suit, which sought summons to witnesses, was disposed of by the trial court on 24.02.2014.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.5447 of 2012
ORDER:
This Civil Revision Petition, under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, is filed challenging the order, dated 24.07.2012, passed in Interlocutory Application No.337 of 2012 in Original Suit No.2046 of 2010 by the VIII Junior Civil Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad, whereunder and whereby, the petition filed under Order XVI Rule 1 read with 151 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 to summon the official witnesses, was dismissed.
As per the information received by this Court through e- courts website, the main suit was disposed of on 24.02.2014 by the trial Court, as such, the petition has become infructuous.
Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuous. Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in this revision shall stand closed. There shall be no order as to costs.
M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY,J
Date:21.06.2017 YVL
2
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY
CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.5447 of 2012
Date:21.06.2017
YVL
M. Sathy Narayana Murthy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
