The Civil Revision Petition, filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging an interlocutory order regarding rent deposit and suit disposal, was found infructuous as the main suit was disposed of on 16.04.2013. The petition was accordingly dismissed as infructuous with miscellaneous petitions being closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.3834 of 2012
ORDER:
This Civil Revision Petition, under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, is filed challenging the order, dated 05.01.2012, passed in Interlocutory Application No.4007 of 2010 in Original Suit No.668 of 2010 by the II Additional Chief Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad, whereunder the petition filed by the petitioner herein under Order XV-A of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 to direct the respondents herein to deposit arrears of rent from June, 2010 to November, 2010 and continue to pay the rent, was allowed.
As per the information received by this Court through e- courts website, the main suit was disposed of on 16.04.2013 by the trial Court, as such, the petition has become infructuous.
Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuous. Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in this revision shall stand closed. There shall be no order as to costs.
Date:21.06.2017 YVL
_________________________ M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY,J
2
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY
CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.3834 of 2012
Date:21.06.2017
YVL
2 provisions across 2 enactments
M.Satyanarayana Murthy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
