Order dismissing a Civil Revision Petition under Article 226 as infructuous because the underlying main suit was disposed of by the trial court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTI CE M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY
CI VI L REVI SI ON PETI TI ON No.797 of 2012
ORDER:
This Civil Revision Petition, under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, is filed challenging the order, dated 11.11.2011, passed in Interlocutory Application No.156 of 2010 in Original Suit No.227 of 2009 by the Principal Junior Civil Judge, Nuzvid, Krishna District, whereunder the petition filed under Order XXVI Rule 9 CPC, to appoint an advocate commissioner to note down the physical features of the schedule property, was dismissed.
As per the information received by this Court through e-courts website, the main suit was disposed of on 30.11.2016 by the trial Court, as such, the petition has become infructuous.
Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuous.
Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in this revision shall stand closed. There shall be no order as to costs.
_________________________ M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY,J
Date:20.06.2017 INL
M. Satyanarayana Murthy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
