The High Court dismissed the civil revision petition as infructuous because the underlying suit had already been disposed of by the lower court, rendering the revision no longer maintainable.
Petition dismissed as infructuous; no costs awarded; pending miscellaneous petitions closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY
C.R.P.No.5075 OF 2012
ORDER:
Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the cause in the civil revision petition does not survive for adjudication as the suit in O.S.No.114 of 2006 was disposed of on 12.03.2013 by the Principal Junior Civil Judge, Narasapur and hence, the revision petition may be dismissed as infructuous.
Recording the said submission, the Civil Revision Petition
is dismissed as infturcuous. No costs.
Pending miscellaneous petitions in the petition, if any,
shall stand closed. __________________________________ M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY,J 06.06.2017 kvrm
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the civil revision petition survives for adjudication given the dismissal of the underlying suit.
Petitioner
M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
