The single judge dismissed the Civil Revision Petition as infructuous because the underlying main suit was dismissed for default. No substantive order was needed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY
CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO.4592 OF 2012
ORDER :
This Civil Revision Petition, under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, is filed challenging the order, dated 16.07.2012, in I.A.No.2236 of 2011 in O.S.No.21 of 2009 on the file of I Additional District Judge, Kurnool, whereunder and whereby, application filed under Order XIV Rule 1 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 to frame additional issue i.e., whether the suit is maintainable in the absence of a relief for declaration that the plaintiff is a lineal descendant of late J.Azeez Ahmed Khan, was dismissed.
Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this revision shall stand closed. There shall be no order as to costs.
___________________________________ M. SATYANARAYANA MURTHY, J
JUNE 05, 2017 YVL
2
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY
CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO.4592 OF 2012
Date: 05.06.2017
YVL
2 provisions across 2 enactments
M. SATYANARAYANA MURTHY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
